Search for: "In re Judicial Inquiry No. 2005-02" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm by Bernard Bell
  Feeling constrained by the skeletal nature of the APA’s rulemaking provision, 5 U.S.C. 553, and the now long-standing judicial doctrine that courts cannot supplement those provisions, the Third Circuit permitted HHS to do so. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
This prong requires an inquiry into whether the party that claimed to have made the retention was objectively reasonable in concluding that a confidential relationship had been created between the party and the consultant. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:47 am by Steven Boutwell
To avoid any uncertainty under this flexible inquiry, the party desiring the arbitration agreement should be sure to have both parties sign the contract for definitive proof of an agreement. 2. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am by Schachtman
” Harry Frankfurt, On Bullshit 63 (Princeton Univ. 2005). [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 9:15 am
Category: Recent Decisions Body: In re Judicial Inquiry No. 2005-02 SC18069  (Grand jury; subject matter jurisdiction;                             [W]hether the Appellate Court correctly construed General Statutes § § 54-47b through 54-47g (grand jury… [read post]