Search for: "In re Kao" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Brooklyn’s Library Moves to Slip Books Through Red State Bans MSN – Madina Touré (Politico) | Published: 9/24/2022 The front line of America’s culture war now runs straight through the nation’s school libraries, with conservatives in dozens of states outlawing books and instruction and the left working to shield targeted authors. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Martin Kao, Clifford Chen, and Lawrence Lum Kee were formerly the chief executive, chief financial officer, and accountant, respectively, for a defense contractor prohibited under federal law from making contributions in federal elections. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:24 am by Kristian Soltes
” Teh Shou Kao, the owner of a Chinese restaurant in Michigan, first filed suit against the Pennsylvania-based CardConnect in November 2016, alleging that the company manipulated contracts signed by merchants in order to jack up payment processing fees. . . . [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:54 am by Dennis Crouch
Eon Labs and In re Kao, the Federal Circuit had already extended the printed matter doctrine to encompass the conveyance of information in non-printed forms, such as verbal speech or sign language. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 6:39 am by scottgaille
  Instead, the fox indirectly causes the counter-party to become the proponent of the fox’s compromise—so the counter-party gains face (kao o tateru). [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 7:09 pm by Thomas & Pearl
“Osjećam se dobro, kao što sam znao da bih” [yeah, moj čovjek James B je rekao da mi reći]. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 6:02 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
”); Inre Kao, 639 F.3d 1057, 1067 (Fed. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
., 683 F.3d at 1363;see also In re Huai-Hung Kao, 639 F.3d 1057, 1068 (Fed.Cir. 2011) (“Where the offered secondary considerationactually results from something other than what is bothclaimed and novel in the claim, there is no nexus to themerits of the claimed invention. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 12:12 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Kao, 639 F.3d 1057, 1067 (Fed. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:11 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2003))Of no patentable significanceIn re Huai-Hung Kao, 639 F.3d 1057, 1070 (Fed. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 6:07 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Note similar text in Ex parte Norlin.Crish, Spada and Obiaya are also cited.In re Kao is cited on secondary considerations. [read post]