Search for: "In re Marriage of Roe" Results 1 - 20 of 118
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2024, 3:40 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Video below: Thousands take part in LGBTQ+ Pride march in Jerusalem Since Roe v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am by Josh Blackman
"It's perfectly clear that nobody in 1868 thought that the 14th Amendment was going to protect the right to same-sex marriage," he says. [read post]
7 May 2023, 5:39 pm by Howard Friedman
Maril, From Liberation To (Re)Criminalization: Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Jackson Women’s Health Organization did not revive the older laws—which included criminal penalties for individuals who aid or abet abortion—because they had been invalidated as unconstitutional by Roe v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
From reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act, to the Electoral Count Reform Act, to the Respect for Marriage Act that protects the right to marry the person you love. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The first is essentially what the originalists have been saying in response to that school, namely that there's too much play in the joints, too many different ways to read these underlying normative principles—we're back to the age-old back-and-forth of "your constitutional theory generates indeterminate results and can't constrain judges' politics! [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm by Zoe Stern
The ruling will re-allow providers to perform abortions after six weeks. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  He thus expressed reservations about Griswold and then wrote a savage attack on Roe even though he supported reproductive choice politically. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Rights can only (or at least usually, for Fleming never quite says whether Roe would meet these criteria) be recognized through the process of common law constitutionalism (p. 117). [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
For example, if the other eight Justices are all in agreement, she might rethink (and re-rethink) her dissenting vote. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 10:00 am by Josh Blackman
"And the only reason people should accept what judges do is because they're doing law, they're doing something that they were put there to do. [read post]