Search for: "In re Samuel P. (2002)"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Regardless of how many cases are cited (and there are many possible “precedents”), the true parameter does not have a 95% probability of lying within the interval given by a given 95% confidence interval.[9] Similarly, as much as judges would like p-values and confidence intervals to eliminate the need to worry about systematic error, their saying so cannot make it so.[10] Even a mighty federal judge cannot make the p-value probability, or its complement, substitute for… [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 2:20 am
“New Challenges in Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments”, in Franco Ferrari, Diego P. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 12:49 am
“New Challenges in Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments”, in Franco Ferrari, Diego P. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 11:51 pm
“New Challenges in Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments”, in Franco Ferrari, Diego P. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 7:46 am
Biresaw, Samuel Maigreg “Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:25 pm
Biresaw, Samuel Maigreg “Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 3:14 am
Biresaw, Samuel Maigreg “Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 12:22 am
Biresaw, Samuel Maigreg “Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 3:33 pm
Biresaw, Samuel Maigreg “Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 10:52 am
Biresaw, Samuel Maigreg “Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 3:58 am
Biresaw, Samuel Maigreg “Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm
Mauro, 139 P.3d 2 (Cal. 2006). [4] And a related question: When a system is generally secret, what provisions are there for public access? [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
“Veni, vidi, vici”: Julius Caesar, 47 BC The more than ten-year-old effort by Access Copyright (“AC”) to impose a “mandatory tariff” through the Copyright Board on Canadian educational institutions is over in a quick, decisive, and devastating unanimous judgment from Justice Rosalie Abellaof the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”). 85 years of legislative policy and SCC jurisprudence are re-affirmed, vindicated, and continued. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:07 am
Lehotsky (Harvard 2002 / D. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm
As such, we have rarely done copyright work for our clients, not because we’re not good at it, but because we feel that it is money that is not well spent. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
P&F provides services as both a collection agency and a law firm. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
S5 (1990); Straus S, Richardson W, Glasziou P, Haynes R., Evidence-Based Medicine. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 11:31 am
Guest Post by Professor Samuel F. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
United States, 296 F.3d 1237 (11th Cir. 2002). [read post]
