Search for: "In the Interest of: C.J.S." Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm by MOTP
Rangel, for Scripps NP Operating, LLC, a Wisconsin Limited Liability Company, Successor in Interest to Scripps Texas Newspapers, LP d/b/a Corpus Christi Caller-Times and the E.W. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
“Valuation Issues in Eminent Domain Litigation: What You Need to Know” Alan Ackerman, Esq. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 2:00 am by Robert Kreisman
With the underlying decree boosted by fees, costs and interest, the judgment against Cube Global was $676,222. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:48 am by Jamie J. Baker, JD, MLIS
And it's interesting to see what the legal writing folks think about legal research pedagogy because they are often driving the decisions on this front. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:33 am by Jeff Welty
I’m interested in hearing others’ thoughts about the legal issues and about the practice out there. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:33 am by Jeff Welty
I’m interested in hearing others’ thoughts about the legal issues and about the practice out there. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. [read post]
12 May 2015, 7:12 am by Jeff Welty
Foster, Validity and Efficacy of Accused’s Waiver of Unanimous Verdict, 97 A.L.R.3d 1253 (1980); 50A C.J.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am by Orin Kerr
  And there’s an interesting nugget here, too. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
But in the end, the most interesting aspect of the case is the way in which law is understood as open textured enough to permit private governance through contract. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:22 am by Devlin Hartline
The receiver argued that, given Righthaven’s poor chances of success on appeal, it was in the best interests of the receivership to cease the appeals process. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 10:46 am by Steve Davies
Sullivan dismissed the champerty claim, granted in part and denied in part the RICO and malicious prosecution counts, and denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the counts brought under the Virginia Conspiracy Act, as well as those alleging abuse of process and “maintenance”, defined as ” ‘helping another prosecute a suit’ in which the helping party has no bona fide interest. 14 C.J.S. [read post]