Search for: "Independent Acceptance Co. v. California"
Results 1 - 20
of 424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2024, 5:47 am
In fact, it is not unprecedented for a judge to order appointment of an independent vocational expert pursuant to Labor Code section 5701, much like a “regular physician” is appointed by a judge when the medical-legal record is insufficient to rely on for a just decision and the parties will not agree to an agreed medical examiner [ see City of Torrance v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:10 pm
Empire Storage & Ice Co. (1949). [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
“The principal would not accept any of our requests to remove the suspension. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
JUST CLICK ON THE CASE NAMES BELOW… NorGUARD Insurance Co. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
The following facts, among others, can be relevant: whether the worker determines or can meaningfully negotiate the charge or pay for the work provided; whether the worker accepts or declines jobs or chooses the order and/or time in which the jobs are performed; whether the worker engages in marketing, advertising, or other efforts to expand their business or secure more work; and whether the worker makes decisions to hire others, purchase materials and equipment, and/or rent space. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
We base our analysis on our experience as Commissioners of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), an independent agency charged by Congress with promoting a vibrant and diverse media ecosystem consistent with the First Amendment. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
December 18, 2023 Clients, Friends, and Associates: As we near the end of 2023, we have highlighted some recent industry developments that will likely impact many of our clients. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
No excuses accepted. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:05 am
In StarNet Insurance Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 7:17 pm
Castleberry v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
Co. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
July 3, 2023, settled) SEC v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
”[10] The precise threshold for “excluding the possibility” is unclear, but some courts have said it does not require “definitive” exclusion, and that the defendant’s theory of the case should be credited,[11] though not accepted as truth when factual discrepancies are clear. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 8:22 am
Hefai Neniang Trading Co., 2023 WL 4201748 (W.D. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:35 pm
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. [read post]
