Search for: "JACKSON V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
| A Penn Program on Regulation panel considers the merits of reforming U.S. aviation regulation. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  In my discretion, I have accepted this recording into the record.Turning to the merits, a board of education has broad authority to prescribe the course of study in the schools of the district (Education Law § 1709 [3]; Appeal of McLoughlin and Carusi, 44 Ed Dept Rep 336, Decision No. 15,191; Appeal of Murphy, et al., 39 id. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  In my discretion, I have accepted this recording into the record.Turning to the merits, a board of education has broad authority to prescribe the course of study in the schools of the district (Education Law § 1709 [3]; Appeal of McLoughlin and Carusi, 44 Ed Dept Rep 336, Decision No. 15,191; Appeal of Murphy, et al., 39 id. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The ruling in Individual Members of the Medical Licensing Board of Indiana v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm by Justin Hendrix
Judge Terry Doughty’s opinion: “Various emails show Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits through evidence that the motivation of the NIAID Defendants was a ‘take down’ of protected free speech. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:16 am by Amy Howe
The rent-stabilization system at the center of 74 Pinehurst v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:47 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to review a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board is jurisdictional. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Jackson Women’s Health Organization did not revive the older laws—which included criminal penalties for individuals who aid or abet abortion—because they had been invalidated as unconstitutional by Roe v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit held that a group called “Feds for Medical Freedom” could challenge that requirement in federal district court, despite the provisions of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 channeling federal employees’ challenges to adverse personnel actions to the Merit Systems Protection Board, subject to review by the U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
CAUTION: These WCAB panel decisions have not been designated a “significant panel decision” by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
The question pre- sented is whether the admissions systems used by Harvard College and UNC are lawful under the Equal Protection Clause of the Four- teenth Amendment. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
The question pre- sented is whether the admissions systems used by Harvard College and UNC are lawful under the Equal Protection Clause of the Four- teenth Amendment. [read post]
18 May 2023, 8:01 am by John Elwood
The FDIC board acted based on the recommendation of an administrative law judge who was removable by the federal Merit Systems Protection Board only for cause; the MSPB is in turn itself removable by the president only for cause. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) to hold that abortion rights were not protected under the Equal Protection Clause.During that same term in 1974, however, the Court did hold in Cleveland Board of Education v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:18 pm by Legal Aggregate
Marstiller and its implications for the personal injury compensation system. [read post]