Search for: "JOHNSON v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE" Results 1 - 20 of 136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Cardinal Health The $109 million settlement with Cardinal Health resolves allegations concerning the acquisition and integration of Cordis Corporation from Johnson & Johnson for $1.9 billion in 2015. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
The tribunal reversed a fine imposed on Clearview AI, a facial image database service, on the basis that the (UK) GDPR did not apply to the processing of personal data by the company. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
On Monday 9 October 2023 Johnson J heard a pre-trial review in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
The YouTube Settlement’s Impact on Kids Content,” Garrett Johnson, Tesary Lin, James C. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
 Pix Credit hereESG, has been driven by the private sector and intensely debated in the context of privately ordered responsible business conduct standards, and formed part of a rich debates among market actors and public international organizations about the role and nature of so-called non-financial siclosure in genmeral, and sustainability and climate related factors in decision making. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:34 pm by centerforartlaw
Kitaj Estate; Farley Gwazda, Gwazda Art Services; and contemporary art curator, writer and researcher Kristina Newhouse. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:07 am by Douglas London
A recent New York Times investigation suggests the Internal Revenue Service’s “random” selection of former FBI Director James Comey and his deputy, Andrew McCabe, for the most invasive type of audit might have been anything but random. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 21-379, which has been rescheduled twice. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Department of the Treasury, in a joint statement with Austria, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom, announced it would no longer impose retaliatory tariffs on these five countries for their use of taxes on company revenues from digital services that would impact large U.S. tech companies. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am by Editor Charlie
 These Comments have also been endorsed by the national and international music creator groups additionally listed above. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
The first is increasing the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) budget by $80 billion, primarily to hire more agents and increase auditing rates for high-income and high-net-worth taxpayers and for corporations. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the complaint sufficiently alleges that Levine subsequently represented plaintiffs in connection with audits by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and New York Department of Taxation and Finance (NYDTF) and in tax litigation continuously from May 16, 2008, the date Boesky signed a power of attorney permitting Levine to represent him before the NYDTF, through 2016. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 3:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the complaint sufficiently alleges that Levine subsequently represented plaintiffs in connection with audits by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and New York Department of Taxation and Finance (NYDTF) and in tax litigation continuously from May 16, 2008, the date Boesky signed a power of attorney permitting Levine to represent him before the NYDTF, through 2016. [read post]
Subchapter V – Return to Work Reporting Requirement Employers have a method to report if an employee refuses to return to work Plain language about returning to work Subchapter VI – Other Related Provisions and Technical Corrections Pay an extra $100 per week to individuals who have at least $5,000 a year in self-employment income, but are disqualified from receiving Pandemic Unemployment Assistance because they are not eligible for regular state unemployment benefits. [read post]