Search for: "Jack Doe 1" Results 1 - 20 of 2,464
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
 The most prominent example of compatibilism is Jack Balkin's theory, which he explicated and defended in his book, Living Originalism. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am by Matthew A. Seligman
The future of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution of former president Donald Trump for the alleged 2020 election conspiracy depends on the Supreme Court’s decision on presidential immunity in three ways. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:00 pm by Joanna Herzik
The attorney has not heard back from the owner, so they assume that they were the intended victim of a scam. 1 Groat Machinery, Inc. 39555 Orchard Hill Place Novi, MI 48375 ATTN: Mr. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
In that regard, does the U.S. employment visa system as it currently stands, propel the old saying that a “jack of all trades is a master of none” and rewards only those foreign nationals who are “masters” of a single field of endeavor? [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Scott Kominers should have been excluded.[36] Following the filing of the opening brief, a coalition led by art collective MSCHF filed an amicus brief in support of Rothschild.[37] The coalition includes CTHDRL, a digital design and experience studio, artists Alfred Steiner and Jack Butcher, and the free-speech advocacy group Author’s Alliance. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:00 am by Michelle
For the US launch, Visa has signed data access agreements with banks and fintechs on the merchant side, including Capital One, Fiserv, Jack Henry, Dwolla and Max rewards. . . . [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm by Marty Lederman
§ 1512(c)(1); and to conspire to deny individuals’ constitutional rights. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 2:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
"To recover under § 9-1-28.1(a)(4) [the Rhode Island] false light statute], [a] plaintiff must establish that there has been some publication of a false or fictitious fact which implies an association which does not exist; and the association which has been published or implied would be objectionable to the ordinary reasonable man under the circumstances. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Professor Jack Balkin's new book, "Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation," continues the author's longstanding efforts to merge living constitutionalism and originalism into a workable and normatively attractive theory of constitutional interpretation. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 7:51 pm by Maria Hook
  A key feature of the scheme is that it seeks to “streamline the process for resolving civil proceedings with a trans-Tasman element in order to reduce costs and improve efficiency” (Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (TTPA), s 3(1)(a)). [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:25 am by DBL Law
Video Transcript 0:05 one of the things 0:07 that you know my parents instilled is 0:12 that there’s an opportunity every day 0:15 for us to make a difference in someone’s 0:18 life 0:21 and many days I’ll miss 0:24 it but the great news is is that I’ll 0:27 have another opportunity tomorrow you 0:30 know I think that um there are so many 0:33 people that um don’t have the blessings 0:38 uh in terms of being able to do things 0:40… [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:11 am by DBL Law
View the Video on YouTube Video Transcript0:05 one of the things 0:07 that you know my parents instilled is 0:12 that there’s an opportunity every day 0:15 for us to make a difference in someone’s 0:18 life 0:21 and many days I’ll miss 0:24 it but the great news is is that I’ll 0:27 have another opportunity tomorrow you 0:30 know I think that um there are so many 0:33 people that um don’t have the blessings 0:38 uh in terms of being… [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am by Vladyslav Lanovoy
Al Haq argued that Criterion 1(b) does not require a predictive assessment and sets a “lower” standard than Criterion 2(c). [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm by Amy Howe
It could also affect the proceedings in the case brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith against former President Donald Trump in a federal court in Washington, D.C. [read post]