Search for: "Jacobs v. Stone"
Results 1 - 20
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
The complaints relate to: Two editions of Friday Morning with Esther and Phil (presented by husband and wife Conservative MPs Esther McVey and Philip Davies); “State of the Nation”, a programme presented by another Tory MP, Jacob Rees-Mogg; and an episode of the Laurence Fox show which was guest presented by Martin Daubney. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
., United States v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On the same day, there were hearings on applications for injunctions in the cases of Payone v Logo and Searl v Dimova-Handley. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
Canada On 9 May 2023, the plaintiff’s motion for a Norwich order was dismissed by Morgan J in the case of Jacobs v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am
On (2), one had to conduct a multifactorial assessment based on all the circumstances of the case which included the relevant factors set out by David Stone in MEI Fields Designs Ltd v Saffron Cards and Gifts Ltd [2018] EWHC 132 (IPEC) as follows: (a) the terms of the contract of employment; (b) where the work was created; (c) whether the work was created during normal office hours; (d) who provided the materials for [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Bruen is quite simply a national nightmare.In United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Trump White House Pressured Disney to Censor … Jimmy Kimmel MSN – Asawin Suebsaeng (Rolling Stone) | Published: 2/26/2023 In early 2018, then-President Trump was so upset by late night host Jimmy Kimmel’s comedic jabs he directed his White House staff to call up one of Disney’s top executives in Washington, D.C., to complain and demand action. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:31 pm
" Stone v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
The Domestic Abuse Commissioner for England and Wales, Nicole Jacobs, filed complaints with IPSO, OFCOM and Ministers at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport about the media coverage, which she called ‘sensationalist and victim blaming’. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
On 10 February 2023, McLean J dismissed an appeal in the case of Safavi-Naini v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
United States The Supreme Court is also expected to hear two cases – Moody v NetChoice and NetChoice v Paxton – concerning the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas, which restrict the content moderation capabilities of social media companies. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm
Jacobs. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 7:15 am
That music included stuff by the Grateful Dead, The Who, The Rolling Stones, and others. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 4:36 pm
Manuel Cepeda Vargas v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:55 pm
We just published today David McGowan's article on rethinking New York Times v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am
Jacob Ware dropped from the docket after he was declared incompetent to stand trial on account of delusions and paranoia, and Joshua Clough pleaded guilty to a weapons charge at the end of 2011. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:27 am
It found the involved goods and services to be related, concluding that the "something more" test of Jacobs v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
16th-century painting of a civil law notary, by Flemish painter Quentin MassysGlobal consensus appears to be moving steadily toward the embrace of a principle touching on "the ethical considerations which a lawyer should take into account in the field of business and human rights when advising clients. [read post]
