Search for: "James v. General Motors Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
General Motors Corp., 141 F.3d 714, 720 (7th Cir. 1998) (disallowing opinion of expert witness, who “lacked any scientific basis for an opinion about … motives,” about defendant’s failure to add safety measure in order to “save money”); In re Diet Drugs Prods. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:25 am by admin
“You are more than entitled not to know what the word ‘performative’ means. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
And it is worth remembering that the John Lewis Act had seemed to be the bill most likely to receive at least some Republican support, because it mostly tries to restore the status quo ante that the Supreme Court’s conservative majority destroyed in Shelby County v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:07 pm by MOTP
Standard of review We review declaratory judgments decided by summary judgment under the same standards that govern summary judgments generally. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the result of Defense Secretary James Mattis’ Implementation Plan is pretty much the same: transgender individuals are generally not allowed to serve openly in the military. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
Air and Liquid Systems Corp. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
Martinez testified that although the precise numbers fluctuate, the percentages in the four-month sample period were generally reflective of the population of vehicles the MVD monitors for any given period.State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 12:37 pm by Schachtman
Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., 350 F.3d 316, 322 (3d Cir. 2003) (affirming exclusion of “speculative and unreliable” expert evidence). [2] citing Stair v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Supreme Court of New Zealand 2004-2013© 2015 Thomson Reuters New Zealandedited by Matthew Barber and Mary-Rose Russell, Senior Lecturers in Law, Auckland University of Technology Excerpt: selections from Chapter 3: A Barrister’s Perspective by James Farmer QC [Footnotes omitted. [read post]