Search for: "Jeffrey Duck" Results 1 - 20 of 66
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2022, 3:41 am by Goldstein Law Firm
Before you take the plunge, make sure you have all of your ducks in […] The post Buying a Franchise in Your 30s: What Do You Need to Know? [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 1:14 am by Florian Mueller
No matter how hard I try, I can't think of a more fundamental question of U.S. antitrust law than where to draw the line between Section 1 (concerted action, cartels) and Section 2 (unilateral conduct, abuse of market power) of the Sherman Act. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:32 am
 And here's what I wrote 16 years ago (when GWB needed to fill a Supreme Court seat):Jeffrey Rosen re-airs the topic of "super-stare decisis" -- the notion that the precedential value of some cases is especially strong, perhaps so strong that you ought to have to agree in advance not to overrule them to win confirmation to the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
National/Federal As Trump’s Presidency Recedes into History, Scholars Seek to Understand His Reign – and What It Says About American Democracy MSN – David Nakamura (Washington Post) | Published: 1/18/2021 President Trump’s four years in office ended after a reign defined by constant chaos, corruption, and scandal, a tenure that numerous scholars predict is destined to rank him among America’s worst presidents. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 10:31 am by Benjamin Wittes
Anxiety about the lame-duck period is nothing new. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm by Richard Hasen
Ginsburg’s dissent calling for the Florida recount of ballots to continue was one of four dissenting opinions issued in the case; she told Professor Jeffrey Rosen in 2014 that issuing four dissents was a tactical error that “confused the press. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 4:11 am by SHG
In the lame duck session after Biden wins? [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
A supreme flouting of the military and industrial contexts can be found in DeVries v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:06 pm by Jackie McDermott
Leading court watchers offered insight into how these new oral arguments will work and recapped the Court’s recent decisions in conversation with host Jeffrey Rosen on last week’s episode of We the People. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:02 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
They are like ducks out of water, and most think the Federal Rules of Evidence are far too mundane to master. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 4:05 pm by Tom Smith
“He could have thought, ‘I need to get my ducks in a row. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:58 pm by Associated Press
NEW YORK — Confronted about allegations that he orchestrated a sex trafficking ring that brought girls to him and his high-profile acquaintances, financier Jeffrey Epstein repeatedly refused to answer so as not to incriminate himself, according to court records released Friday. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 11:12 am by Dennis Crouch
Katja Lindroos Weckström, Food For Thought (Halabi “creates a bridge between two polarized debates”) Jeffrey Pojanowski, Exploring the Regulatory World (“the web of legal actors and norms operating in international IP is bewildering in its complexity”) Daniel Hemel, Why do Nations Obey International Law (“it is doubtful that any one theory will fully explain the pattern of international IP shelters that Halabi has observed”) Patricia… [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Jeffrey Segal debunks “five of the most persistent misconceptions” about the Supreme Court, with an eye to the extent to which political considerations influence the institution. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 8:18 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
If you are injured in an accident in Massachusetts, call the Law Offices of Jeffrey S. [read post]