Search for: "John Does Nos. 1-25" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm by vforberger
The fact that Uber’s business model does not require regularly scheduled work hours from its workforce does not translate into an automatic independent contractor relationship. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
A low-cost alternative, if it materializes, may tempt smaller activists—perhaps including better-funded versions of the “issues” activists now plastering corporate boardrooms with various 14a-8 stockholder proposals—to nominate one or two directors to press their concerns in the boardroom.[1] However, Rule 14a-19 does not address the longstanding question of just what information the nominating stockholder should disclose to voting stockholders. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
Mann, against National Review magazine, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and Mark Steyn.[1] Back in 2014, I commented upon the oddity of a scientist’s claim of defamation against lay people for criticizing a scientist’s work.[2] Mann took umbrage to statements, critical of his work that generated a “hockey-stick” model of global temperature rises. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[25] Bankruptcy filings indicate that FTX didn’t even maintain an accurate list of its bank accounts or account signatories.[26] Further, when there are wide-spread failures among large private issuers, the spillover effects can go well beyond the investor base of that one company.[27] Othe [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:34 am by Sherli M. Furst
John Doe Nos. 1-25, Case No. 154644/2022, NYSCEF Doc. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
That fall, defendants wrote four letters to DEC regarding tidal wetlands permit nos. 1- 4 728-03511, 1-4 728-05497, 1-4 728-05498 and 1-4 728-05499, which allowed Village People to construct four single-family residences on its properties (id., ,i 10; NYSCEF Doc No. 40 at 103, 107, 112 and 135). [read post]
Some have argued that, because the Nation’s approach to climate change is politically contested,[1] and since these matters affect major policy questions over which Congress has not granted the SEC new, explicit powers, the Commission lacks authority to require disclosure in this area.[2] For the reasons given below, the Commission should disregard these claims, focusing instead on the challenging policy choices that any finalization of the proposal would require. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Caroline A. Crenshaw
Interestingly, the choice to redeem one’s shares does not impact the ability to vote in favor of completing the de-SPAC. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 10:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Coalition for Affordable Drugs (ADROCA) LLC v.Acorda Therapeutics, Inc., Nos. [read post]