Search for: "Johns v. Ferguson et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Pappas et al. find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[14] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[15] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the profit margins were so… [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:30 am
See Ferguson v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
On the same day there was an application in the case of Tinkler v Ferguson before Nicol J. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am
Robert Loeb and Sarah Grant argued that the Eastern District of Virginia’s ruling in Al Shimari, et. al. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:03 pm
Ferguson? [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am
Filburn et al were left untouched.) [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 3:20 pm
Desmond et al. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 12:54 pm
Knowles v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Rev. 609 (1998) READ 620-636 Supreme Court of the United StatesRoy ROMER, Governor of Colorado, et al., Petitioners,v.Richard G. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
-John 192 Cal.App.4th 90 (2011) MEGAN KUCKER et al., as Trustees, etc., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
-John 192 Cal.App.4th 90 (2011) MEGAN KUCKER et al., as Trustees, etc., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Wheelahan v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Minn. 2008)(noting that some but not all courts have concluded relative risks under two support finding expert witness’s opinion to be inadmissible) XYZ, et al. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:05 pm
Hoffman, of course, had a core argument of considerable merit, in Kiobel, et al., v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
Anthony Cuti et al. and United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Johns Manville Corp., slip op. at 3, Phila. [read post]
29 May 2010, 11:33 am
United States to Al-Haramain v. [read post]
