Search for: "Joiner v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am
United States, 293 F. 1013, 1014 (D.C. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:51 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm
Alexandria Women's Health Clinic (1993) (interpreting § 1985(3)'s first clause); United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., Loc. 610, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:43 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
The United States Court of Appeals explained its understanding of complexity that should remove a case from the province of the seventh amendment: “A suit is too complex for a jury when circumstances render the jury unable to decide in a proper manner. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
AlumaSafway Inc. v Certain Employees of AlumaSafway and United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local Union No. 1325, 2022 CanLII 76637 (AB LRB) 4. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
NLRB, 347 F.3d 1145, 1153–58 (9th Cir. 2003); see also United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
Kentucky State Dist. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
(1) Trial court’s instructions that the jury “will determine what the assault was” did not amount to an improper expression of opinion on the evidence in context; (2) The trial court’s response to a jury question during deliberations regarding a prior conviction was an not impermissible expression of opinion on the evidence State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am
Judges were participants in the tradition and had to abide by its rules – both stated and unstated. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am
The Act gave all participants in a qualifying “professional review action” immunity from being held liable in damages “under any law of the United States or of any State (or political subdivision thereof) with respect to the action. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
”[5] This rejection of the clear demands of a statute has infected even the intermediate appellate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
”[9] The Reporter’s example of PCBs and small lung cancer was an obvious reference to the Joiner case, in which the Supreme Court held that the trial judge had properly excluded causation opinions. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:47 am
United States, 54 App. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 1:01 pm
Joiner received was “worthless” in that it would “cost more to repair than to purchase a brand new unit. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am
In the Paoli Railroad yard litigation, plaintiffs claimed injuries and increased risk of future cancers from environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am
”13 Mandatory Not Precatory The better reasoned cases decided under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and state-court analogues, follow the Reference Manual in making clear that confounding factors must be carefully addressed and eliminated. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
State, 12 S.W.3d 6, 30 (Tex. 1999); see Walker v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert is now over 25 years old. [read post]
