Search for: "Jones v. Republic Services, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 21/07/23) East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22nd June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and others (Northern Ireland), heard 14th-15th December 2022 Smith and another v Royal Bank of Scotland, heard… [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
  A portion of the decision lamented the dearth of specifics offered by the People's Republic of China's State Secret Law with respect to determining whether information produced is protected and what liability would attach to that disclosure. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am by Michael Douglas
In particular, Huang covered Australian Information Commission v Facebook Inc [2020] FCA 531, which concerned an ex parte application for service outside of the jurisdiction and an application for substituted service. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am by Rachel Sachs
Thomson Reuters analyzes the relationship between consumer advocates and PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am by Rob Robinson
California Court Declines to Follow Race Tires, Allows Taxation of eDiscovery Costs - bit.ly/IZoWhW (K&L Gates) Peck Wins By Submission; Parties Get Shot At Title Fight - bit.ly/Jfheio (eLessons Learned) Random Sample Calculations And My Prediction That 300,000 Lawyers Will Be Using Random Sampling By 2022 – bit.ly/IBIaZ5 (Ralph Losey) “Reasonableness” is Key When Assessing E-Discovery Efforts – bit.ly/IZp7d9 (Mike Hamilton) Reducing… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
Mr Jones has offered the undertaking. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The Defendant pleaded justification, and in mid-2010, applied that an order for service out of the jurisdiction be set aside on the grounds, derived from Jameel (Youssef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc. [2005] QB 946,  that the Tweet did not constitute a real and substantial tort within the jurisdiction. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
Tuesday, Oct. 4 Brad Seligman, JD, civil rights attorney specializing in class action and individual employment and civil rights litigation, will present “What Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., v. [read post]