Search for: "Jones v. US Trustee"
Results 1 - 20
of 160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
The claim related to a letter published to a board of trustees which the Claimant alleged raised safeguarding concerns imputing, inter alia, that the trustees put children and young people in their care at risk, and had scant regard for and cannot be trusted with the health and safety and safeguarding of the students in their care [14]. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 11:36 am
From Teising v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am
The new Speaker of the House, Dave Jones, is still largely unknown. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm
Philip Jones, Ecclesiastical Law: Cathedral Cities: England and Wales. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 11:27 pm
Quick links Peter Frost, Chris Jones and Josh Peters, Lexology: UK: EAT provides welcome guidance on proportionality in belief/freedom of expression cases: on Higgs v Farmor’s School. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am
(Fourth issue) The Supreme Court’s judgment Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Kitchin, with whom Lord Hodge agreed, gave the majority judgment, with Lord Carnwath dissenting in part. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 6:15 am
Windsor, 521 U.S. 591 (1997) and Ortiz v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
Social clubs must be supported by membership fees, dues, and assessments.[26] Most museums’ governance make-up and membership structure could be seen as a characteristic of a 501(c)(7) social club rather than a 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofit.[27] In American Campaign Academy v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 2:23 am
Lord Leggatt, with whom Lord Reed and Lord Lloyd-Jones agree, gave the majority judgment. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:45 am
Jones v Birmingham City Council and another, heard 30th-31st January 2023. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 1:09 am
Philip Jones’s new post complements those in L&RUK on the appointment of diocesan and suffragan bishops within the Church of England. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
The petition was filed by noted Jones Day attorney Greg Castanias along with former SG Noel Francisco and BMS (Juno) deputy GC Henry Hadad. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 4:08 pm
V. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 10:48 am
It has had widespread use for many different types of alleged misconduct. [read post]
15 May 2022, 8:19 am
In this post, Hannah Jones, Assistant Professional Support Lawyer in the Tax team at CMS, comments on Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd [2022] UKSC 10, a case which concerns the UK’s pre-2014 tax treatment of manufactured overseas dividends. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:47 am
HSE: Safe use of ladders and stepladders. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
On Tuesday, the court denied review in just one of last week’s relists, Trustees of the New Life in Christ Church v. [read post]
