Search for: "KEYS v. PETERS"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,132
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
LooperLegal Usage: A Modern Style Guide (2018) by Peter ButtLegal Writing: A Judge’s Perspective on the Science and Rhetoric of the Written Word (2020) by Ho [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:30 pm
Blogpost 27/2024 Transparency and environmental policy are two key issues in the upcoming European Parliament elections. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:02 am
Copan Italia S.p.A. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
The key dispute instead centred on whether the skilled person would think there were reasonable prospects of success in using the hybridisation assay disclosed in Collins in an in situ setting (as claimed). [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
SCARFE J.P., R. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:32 am
And there’s some pride of authorship here—Peter Mahler and I represented the prevailing party in the motion. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Harbut, Peter Infante, William E. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
And in the conditions of ongoing colonialism machineries of law are key infrastructures seeking the elimination and replacement of First Laws and First Nations Peoples. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:45 am
[With thanks to Peter Edge.] [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
On February 19, 2024, the High Court in London in R (Al-Haq) v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm
When expert witnesses rely upon one or a few studies, which telegraph internal validity, this litigation strategy may provide the strongest evidence against the study’s being reasonably relied upon, or its providing “sufficient facts and data” to support an admissible expert witness opinion. [1] Daubert v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 9:52 am
The district court construed several key claim terms. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In Zoetis v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 7:30 am
Annor v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 9:14 am
Coolit v Vidal. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 10:23 am
Pfizer v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
From our office in Guelph, Peter A. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
From our office in Guelph, Peter A. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 2:42 pm
Part I provides descriptions and definitions of key concepts. [read post]
