Search for: "King Provision Corp. v. Burger King Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:18 am
(See Corley v Burger King Corp., 56 F3d 709, 710 [5th Cir 1995]; Martin v Savage Truck Line, 121 F Supp 417, 419 [DDC 1954]). [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:51 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The question before the Court is whether the “arise out of or relate to” requirement for a state court to exercise specific personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant under Burger King Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
New Relists Patterson v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Jareb Gleckel
Almost two decades after releasing its veggie burger, Burger King has begun marketing one such plant-based product: Impossible Foods’ Impossible Burger. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 12:13 pm by Mike Aylward
” A Vermont student sued Burger King after finding a condom in his Whopper. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 3:35 pm
Burger King Corp. will appear at CCH Business Franchise Guide ¶14,501.Further information about CCH Business Franchise Guide is available here. [read post]