Search for: "King v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 1 - 20
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2015, 2:01 pm
A recent decision by a Massachusetts Department of Industrial Accidents Reviewing Board, King v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:08 am
In King v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
The Board found that Dr. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:00 am
"The Medical Board determines whether a member applying for disability retirement benefits is disabled, and the Board of Trustees is bound by the Medical Board's finding that an applicant is, or is not, disabled for duty" (Matter of Russell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 155 AD3d 1046, 1046; see Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d 756, 760). [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:00 am
"The Medical Board determines whether a member applying for disability retirement benefits is disabled, and the Board of Trustees is bound by the Medical Board's finding that an applicant is, or is not, disabled for duty" (Matter of Russell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 155 AD3d 1046, 1046; see Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d 756, 760). [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
Here, the conclusions of the Medical Board were supported by credible evidence, such as its independent interviews and examinations of the petitioner and its review of medical [*2]records from her treating physicians, including, inter alia, reports relating to multiple MRIs of her right knee (see Matter of Maxwell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 210 AD3d at 1096; cf. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
Here, the conclusions of the Medical Board were supported by credible evidence, such as its independent interviews and examinations of the petitioner and its review of medical [*2]records from her treating physicians, including, inter alia, reports relating to multiple MRIs of her right knee (see Matter of Maxwell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 210 AD3d at 1096; cf. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 3:04 am
The Board agreed with Examining Attorney Chrisie Brightmire King that the specimen of use comprises a report that is merely incidental to Applicant's own business, and does not constitute a "good in trade." [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
* The Future of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office: Board 28 to meetOn 11 February 2015, Board 28 of the European Patent Office will meet. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
According to the opinion, the plaintiff slipped and fell at a Burger King and, thereafter, filed a negligence lawsuit against the operators of the restaurant.The plaintiff filed her complaint within the two-year statute of limitations. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:22 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeClaim That Medical Examiner Did Not Show Death From Kick or Punch Rejected; Habeas Relief Denied Hunter v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 11:35 am
This post examines an opinion recently issued by the Supreme Court of Ohio in a “[l]awyer disciplinary proceeding. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 11:12 am
This post examines an opinion the Supreme Court of Ohioissued recently in a lawyer disciplinary proceeding: Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
It is a matter of access, the CJEU lays down in Hejduk -- again explained by Eleonora.* Rihanna T-shirt: Court of Appeal says it's passing offAfter Birss J’s ruling, the Court of Appeal for England and Wales takes Rihanna under its umbrella, Eleonora reports.* "New career system" for EPO Examiners: take on extra workEPO Vice President Guillaume Minnoye invites EPO examiners to perform non-examining functions in additional to a normal… [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
In this post, she hosts another legal analysis of the situation, this time by Catarina Holtz, a former member of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office.* Life as a patent examiner according to the EPO - paid-for article in the New ScientistThe EPO has paid for an article promoting the career path of an EPO Examiner on the New Scientist. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:08 am
In Peterson v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
McBride v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:15 am
The court explained that under King v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:16 pm
She is the Martin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:23 pm
The medical examiner is a board certified forensic pathologist. [read post]
