Search for: "King v. Justice Party" Results 1 - 20 of 1,180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2024, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
On Tuesday 4 June, the Chair of the UK Statistics Authority, Sir Robert Chote, wrote to leaders of political parties to ask that their parties and candidates use statistics appropriately and transparently. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:31 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In a lengthy decision, Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Timothy S. [read post]
23 May 2024, 2:12 pm by randywallace
Justice King began a long, fact specific opinion for the Court noting “Two long-standing but competing interests are at issue in this case: the right to the quiet enjoyment of property versus the right to hunt and harvest wildlife. [read post]
19 May 2024, 11:00 pm
CHECKS REFLECTED THAT THE DISPUTED INVOICE HAD BEEN FULLY PAIDIn a commercial claims case brought in the Kings County Civil Court, CEH&AC alleged that it was owed money for heating system services provided to MRE&P.While the plaintiff alleged that some $2,203.94 was due, after a hearing (and a review of the defendant’s payment receipts), the judge ended up dismissing the case.On appeal, the Appellate Term, Second Department, noted that the defendant’s check memos… [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
But a recent decision by Kings County Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman, Kordonsky v Brudoley, Decision and Order [Sup Ct, Kings County Mar. 26, 2024]), highlights some of the shortcomings of the intervention procedure for unnamed owners in derivative cases. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
Sidar, written by Judge Toby Heytens and joined by Judges Robert Bruce King and J. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am by Eugene Volokh
Sidar, written by Judge Toby Heytens and joined by Judges Robert Bruce King and J. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Sidar, written by Judge Toby Heytens and joined by Judges Robert Bruce King and J. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 5:34 pm by INFORRM
See, for example, The King’s Bench Guide (March 2023), para 4.11 (anonymity) and 9.6 (privacy) The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (2023), para 7.12.11 The Chancery Guide (2022), para 3.35 CPR r 39.2(5) does also permit the order not to be published where the interests of justice so require. [read post]