Search for: "Kramer v. Philadelphia" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Cooper of the Harriburg, PA law office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention.In another case with a similar result, the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania also granted a motion to remand in Sherer v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Aliquippa Hosp., 561 A.2d 733 (Pa. 1989) to be distinguishable because Buttermore did not involve UIM benefits.The Court also rejected the UIM carrier's reliance on the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas case of Crisp v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:42 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  As noted, the court found that this plaintiff could have raised the same types of issues and arguments as asserted in the Gallagher v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In a recent decision out of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas in the case of Bielec v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Philadelphia Co. 1990) (an increased risk claim has “no place” in product liability action), aff’d mem., 599 A.2d 707 (Pa. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In its recent memorandum decision in the case of Gregg v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:31 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
 of the Philadelphia office of Cozen & O'Connor and Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this decision to my attention. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 7:34 am by Joy Waltemath
” Pointing out that the Tenth Circuit, in Kramer v Wasatch County Sheriff’s Office, “seized on this language as a way to reconcile Vance with Staub,” the court here likewise concluded “that this is the appropriate analysis for reconciling the two cases. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In his recent decision in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case of Harvey v. [read post]