Search for: "Lawry v Lawry"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am
Zoe Ingenhaag, Lexology: Gender critical beliefs in the workplace: on Phoenix v The Open University, Meade v Westminster City Council and Anor and Ali v Reason & Nott. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 8:41 am
Recently, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania stopped such an effort by the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) in the case of Lawry v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 6:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 3:29 pm
” Casey v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
For generations, Canadian lawyers have been regulated themselves. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 9:17 pm
Bernardo Sepúlveda-Amor & Merryl Lawry-White, State responsibility and the enforcement of arbitral awards Philip Chong & Blake Primrose, Summary judgment in international arbitrations seated in England Recent DevelopmentsJohn Gaffney, Should the European Union regulate commercial arbitration? [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 12:01 am
‘During arguments Jan. 15 in Lambrix v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:46 am
Merryl Lawry-White, International Investment Arbitration in a Jus Post Bellum Framework James Gallen, Odious Debt and Jus Post Bellum Konstanze von Papp, Biting the Bullet or Redefining ‘Consent’ in Investor-State Arbitration? [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Law Society of British Columbia and Black v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:57 am
[40] Concerning the last question posed, McLachlin J. went on to say: This has been considered in at least two British Columbian cases and I refer to Lawrie v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 4:46 am
Here I'm thinking about cases like United Daughters of the Confederacy v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:20 am
Judgement Released: November 7, 2011 Link to Judgment In upholding an award of partial indemnity costs said to be “virtually the same” as a substantial indemnity award, the Court of Appeal held, among other things, that “while the trial judge did not specifically refer to R. 1.04(1), and while there may be some disproportionality in the [...] [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:09 am
Timmer, The Meaning of ‘Investment’ as a Requirement for Jurisdiction Ratione Materiae of the ICSID CentreFernando Dias Simões, Macau: A Seat for Sino-Lusophone Commercial ArbitrationJuraj Gyarfas, Constitutional Scrutiny of Arbitral Awards: Odd Precedents in Central Europe Fifi Junita, Judicial Review of International Arbitral Awards on the Public Policy Exception in Indonesia Reza Mohtashami & Merryl Lawry-White, The (Non)-Application of the New York Convention by… [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:11 am
60/10 Jackson International Trading Co v OHIM When companies like Jackson Trading Co. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:45 am
Morris v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:20 am
Lawry's Restaurants, Inc., Case No. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
The guiding principle in Scots law is Lawrie v Muir 1950 JC 19, which states that an irregularity in the method by which evidence has been obtained does not necessarily make that evidence inadmissible in a criminal prosecution [17]. [read post]
