Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 1 - 20
of 7,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2018, 9:10 am
[1] Stolze v Addario [2] Evans v Teamsters [3] This seemed to be the implicit theory in the decision of Moore J. in Turner v Uniglobe in rejecting the employer’s submission to this argument of recall. [4] A payroll over $2.5 million requires severance pay of one week per year to a cap of 26 weeks. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 9:10 am
[1] Stolze v Addario [2] Evans v Teamsters [3] This seemed to be the implicit theory in the decision of Moore J. in Turner v Uniglobe in rejecting the employer’s submission to this argument of recall. [4] A payroll over $2.5 million requires severance pay of one week per year to a cap of 26 weeks. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 8:22 am
[1] Gent v Strone [2] Ironically the plaintiff could have demanded full payment of his statutory entitlement which he did not do. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 8:22 am
[1] Gent v Strone [2] Ironically the plaintiff could have demanded full payment of his statutory entitlement which he did not do. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 11:22 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 4:00 pm
Whether or not there was a clear and valid agreement on the issue of layoffs came up in a recent decision by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, McLean v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 7:17 am
In Real Foods v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:54 pm
Constitution should be taken from lay English of 1787, or from legal English. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 1:47 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:16 am
Culza v Brown and Lay Statements This case relates to lay statements in support of VA claims. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 1:01 am
iStock_000000100546_L2.jpg The First Circuit explains the circumstances in which an undercover agent may give lay testimony "as to the meaning of code words or phrases" concerning drug quantities based on the agent's "undercover drug buys"; noting as one factor whether the witness's lay testimony "corresponds" to undisputed facts, in United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:17 am
defcon9_12_bg_071401.jpg In conspiracy and bribery trial, lay testimony concerning deleted e-mails based on an understanding of Microsoft Office products was admissible as lay testimony under FRE 701 and did not constitute expert testimony under FRE 702, in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 11:07 am
In Ristanovic v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 7:36 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 7:58 am
In the recent case (Albert v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 7:24 am
Roslyn Lai & Charles Ho Wang Mak have posted an ASIL Insight on Belokon v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:11 am
Risk of costs when tenant changes mind over lease Lay and Others v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:34 am
In Flagg v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 1:47 am
iStock_000001063043Medium.jpg Eighth Circuit affirms exclusion of lay testimony by company president about the lost profits suffered as a result of a breach of its contract because the witness failed to show any objective basis for his lay opinion, such as an analysis of the market for the contracted solar salt that it would have sold had the salt been delivered under the contract, in US Salt, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 7:07 am
California Appellate Report points to US v. [read post]
