Search for: "Lenz v. Lenz"
Results 1 - 20
of 311
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
Bungie, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 8:21 am
BURBAGE v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 10:27 am
Lenz v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:41 am
Crosley-Corcoran * 17 USC 512(f) Is Dead–Lenz v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:41 pm
Lenz, Principal Medical Device Regulation Expert & Steven J. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 11:37 am
Lenz v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 8:22 am
Crosley-Corcoran * 17 USC 512(f) Is Dead–Lenz v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
Lenz, Principal Medical Device Regulation Expert —It takes a significant amount of time, cost, and effort to prepare a premarket notification 510(k) submission. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 3:37 pm
Lenz v. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 7:13 am
Crosley-Corcoran * 17 USC 512(f) Is Dead–Lenz v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Avoids problems of regulatory arbitrage. 230 v. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 8:05 am
Crosley-Corcoran * 17 USC 512(f) Is Dead–Lenz v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 10:46 am
Crosley-Corcoran * 17 USC 512(f) Is Dead–Lenz v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 12:56 am
CDRH plans to take a phased approach to implement the TAP Pilot throughout the duration of MDUFA V (FY 2023 – FY 2027). [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:12 am
Crosley-Corcoran * 17 USC 512(f) Is Dead–Lenz v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 9:49 am
Crosley-Corcoran * 17 USC 512(f) Is Dead–Lenz v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:23 pm
Arriba Soft), and some focusing on fair use (Lenz v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 10:36 am
Crosley-Corcoran * 17 USC 512(f) Is Dead–Lenz v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:11 am
Crosley-Corcoran * 17 USC 512(f) Is Dead–Lenz v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 12:00 am
The guidance assesses credibility using key concepts from FDA-recognized standard ASME V&V 40 Assessing Credibility of Computational Modeling through Verification and Validation: Application to Medical Devices. [read post]