Search for: "Lexmark Intern., Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 12:08 pm by Dennis Crouch
Static Control Components, Inc., 572 U.S. 118 (2014), that § 281 is not a jurisdictional requirement. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 1:59 pm
Static Control Components, Inc., 572 U.S. 118 (2014), for determining whether the requirements for maintaining a statutory cause of action have been satisfied. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 7:29 am
Static Control Components, Inc., 572 U.S. 118 (2014), in contending that SFM lacked standing to bring the petition for cancellation. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
In short: no trade, no trademark.Two US Court of Appeals opinions have created the possibility that a plaintiff could bring a passing-off action based on use of its trademark outside of the United States only – a powerful new tool for challenging infringers that are first to use the trademark in the United StatesFollowing the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Lexmark International, Inc v Static Control Components, Inc… [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 2:26 am
Static Control Components, Inc., 387 F.3d 522 (6th Cir. 2004)). [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 7:19 pm by Dennis Crouch
Lexmark International, Inc. sells its patented printer cartridges directly to customers and indirectly through authorized resellers. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:44 am by Dennis Crouch
And the Kentucky district court in Static Control Components, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:40 am by Dennis Crouch
Static Control Components, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 1377 (2014) (unfair competition based upon false infringement allegations) Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]