Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED June 26, 2002." Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[25] Bankruptcy filings indicate that FTX didn’t even maintain an accurate list of its bank accounts or account signatories.[26] Further, when there are wide-spread failures among large private issuers, the spillover effects can go well beyond the investor base of that one company.[27] Othe [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am by Alex Phipps
Summarizing defendant’s situation, the court explained that the amendments to North Carolina’s SBM program created a ten-year cap on the term of SBM enrollment and a procedure for petitioning the trial court to end SBM, meaning that “since [d]efendant has been enrolled in SBM for more than ten years, he can obtain a court order terminating that enrollment today. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am by Chris Wesner
Introduction On February 20, 2019, the Debtor filed a Chapter 7 case that was later converted to Chapter 13 by Agreed Order entered June 26, 2019 (Doc. 16). [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The petitioner appealed to the Louisiana Supreme Court, which denied review without providing any reasons for the denial. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
But many default judgments in collection cases brought on consumer debt in Texas are never challenged, and many old judgments containing hefty attorney’s fees re-surface years later when the creditor (or its assignee) files an application for a writ of garnishment to freeze and seize a judgment-debtor’s bank account.ROHRMOOS VENTURE, ERIC LANGFORD, DAN BASSO, AND TOBIN GROVE, Petitioners,v.UTSW DVA HEALTHCARE, LLP, Respondent.No. 16-0006.Supreme Court of Texas.Argued October 31,… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Genovese provides insight to a number of the more specific takings issues to be discussed further on, including partial takings. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
  As countless employers can confirm, FDNS agents claim they are there merely for a “site visit” in order to confirm the accuracy of statements made in an immigration form submitted to USCIS by an employer petitioning USCIS for an employment-based immigration benefit, such as a work visa or, an employment-based green card. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
  As countless employers can confirm, FDNS agents claim they are there merely for a “site visit” in order to confirm the accuracy of statements made in an immigration form submitted to USCIS by an employer petitioning USCIS for an employment-based immigration benefit, such as a work visa or, an employment-based green card. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm by Wolfgang Demino
For 2013, plaintiff's adjusted gross income was $59,638 and she received a tax refund of $2,097.Plaintiff filed her chapter 7 petition on May 31, 2013. [read post]