Search for: "Lord v. Lord"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 10:43 pm
They pick up on their previous comments about whether section 9(3) CDPA on computer-generated works operates as an exception to the originality requirement, especially in light of the E&W Court of Appeal decision in THJ Systems v Sheridan. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:05 am
Etihad StadiumAuthor Cléria De Souza Licence CC BY 2.0 Source Wikimedia CommonsJane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords Justices Males,, Phillips and Birss) Supponor Ltd and another v AIM Sport Development AG [2024] EWCA Civ 396 (23 April 2024)This was an appeal against Mr Justice Meade's judgment in AIM Sport Vision AG v Supponor Ltd and another [2023] EWHC [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:05 am
For example, thedecision of the House of Lords in White v White [2001] 1 AC 596was adopted by the Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong in LKW v DD [2010] HKFLR 016, enshrining the principle of ‘equal sharing’ of matrimonial assets in a shift from previous needs-based approach per C v C which had historically simply provided wives on divorce with enough to meet their reasonable requirements. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
Martin Kratz, R. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:17 pm
Until recently, the leading decision addressing the provision was the High Court decision in Nova Productions v Mazooma Games. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
It is an established principle of law, restated by the House of Lords in Boardman v Phipps (1967), that the relevant question to ask is whether ‘the reasonable man’ (a common benchmark in legal tests), looking at the relevant facts and circumstances of the particular case, would think that there was a ‘real sensible possibility’ of conflict (known as the ‘conflict of interest rule’). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 3:30 am
Emma Cave In Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority (1986) the UK House of Lords held that minors under the age of 16 could access contraceptive advice and treatment in their own right provided they satisfied a test which became known as “Gillick competence. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
The DPDI Bill is currently being debated in the House of Lords. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm
Richmond Newspapers v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:05 am
The judgment In R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL 15, Lord Nicholls had drawn a distinction at [16] between the two elements of Article 9: there was “a difference between freedom to hold a belief and freedom to express or ‘manifest’ a belief. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 1:14 am
In the third (and final) of our blogs reporting on the UK Court of Appeal decision in Lidl v Tesco, we examine the findings in relation to non-use revocation. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 3:27 am
This is the second of three blogs examining the recent UK Court of Appeal decision in Lidl v Tesco[1]. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 1:38 am
Matthew Purvis, House of Lords Library: From the Hansard archives: Fixing a date for Easter? [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 8:33 am
There have been quite a few “Halliburton” appeals in the last couple of decades and at least one example in the House of Lords/Supreme Court (Conor v Angiotech [2008]). [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
Lord Justice Arnold gave observations on the EBA’s decision in G2/21. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:48 pm
Toth v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 10:37 am
Author Abhishekptlbbk Licence CC BY-SA 4.0 Source Wikimedia CommonsJane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lord Justice Nugee, Lady Justice Elizabeth Laing and Lord Justice Birss) J C Bamford Excavators Ltd v Manitou UK Ltd and Another [2024] EWCA Civ 276 (22 March 2024)In JC Bamford Excavators Ltd v Manitou UK Ltd and another [2022] EWHC 1724 (Pat) (04 July 2022), JC Bamford Excavators Ltd ("JCB [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 5:57 am
Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lord Justices Lewison, Arnold and Birss) Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores Ltd and Another (Rev1) [2024] EWCA Civ 262 (19 March 2024)This is the third of my supplementary articles on Lord Justice Jackson's judgment in Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores Ltd and Another (Rev1) [2024] EWCA Civ 262 (19 March 2024). [read post]
