Search for: "Lord v. Lord"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,607
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 10:48 am
Particularly of note was the 2024 Veirein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 12:25 am
: on R (TTT) v Michaela Community Schools Trust [2024] EWHC 843 (Admin). [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
by Achim Czubaiko, Research Fellow („Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter“) and PhD Candidate, supported by the German Scholarship Foundation, Institute for German and International Civil Procedural Law, University of Bonn. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:21 am
She said The digitisation of the processes will follow as soon as possible for the existing contracts, provided that the Lord Chancellor’s court assessment suggests that the system can cope. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Lord, Williston on Contracts § 56:92 [4th ed, May 2023 update]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Lord, Williston on Contracts § 56:92 [4th ed, May 2023 update]). [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:21 am
To further justify deference, the court cited A v Secretary of State for the Home Department, also known as the Belmarsh 9 case, in which the English House of Lords held that deference would be given to the executive’s decision on the assessment of public emergency and the counter-measure devised after the 9/11 terrorist attack in the US. [read post]
8 May 2024, 8:15 am
In 2015 we posted “Spiritual influence” and elections in relation to a report in The Times on the Election Court hearing of the challenge to the re-election of Lutfur Rahman as Mayor of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets and a subsequent note on the decision in Erlam & Ors v Rahman & Anor [2015] EWHC (QB) 1215. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:04 am
In the 'Pablo Escobar' case, the Court accepted that the Spanish public knows Pablo Escobar (1949-1993), who was presumed to have been a drug lord and narco-terrorist. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:43 pm
They pick up on their previous comments about whether section 9(3) CDPA on computer-generated works operates as an exception to the originality requirement, especially in light of the E&W Court of Appeal decision in THJ Systems v Sheridan. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:05 am
Etihad StadiumAuthor Cléria De Souza Licence CC BY 2.0 Source Wikimedia CommonsJane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords Justices Males,, Phillips and Birss) Supponor Ltd and another v AIM Sport Development AG [2024] EWCA Civ 396 (23 April 2024)This was an appeal against Mr Justice Meade's judgment in AIM Sport Vision AG v Supponor Ltd and another [2023] EWHC [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:05 am
For example, thedecision of the House of Lords in White v White [2001] 1 AC 596was adopted by the Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong in LKW v DD [2010] HKFLR 016, enshrining the principle of ‘equal sharing’ of matrimonial assets in a shift from previous needs-based approach per C v C which had historically simply provided wives on divorce with enough to meet their reasonable requirements. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
Martin Kratz, R. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:17 pm
Until recently, the leading decision addressing the provision was the High Court decision in Nova Productions v Mazooma Games. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
It is an established principle of law, restated by the House of Lords in Boardman v Phipps (1967), that the relevant question to ask is whether ‘the reasonable man’ (a common benchmark in legal tests), looking at the relevant facts and circumstances of the particular case, would think that there was a ‘real sensible possibility’ of conflict (known as the ‘conflict of interest rule’). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 3:30 am
Emma Cave In Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority (1986) the UK House of Lords held that minors under the age of 16 could access contraceptive advice and treatment in their own right provided they satisfied a test which became known as “Gillick competence. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
The DPDI Bill is currently being debated in the House of Lords. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm
Richmond Newspapers v. [read post]
