Search for: "Lowe v. Bradford"
Results 1 - 20
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ATTORNEY’S FEES ■Jose Parra, Applicant v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:21 am
(Cohen, v. 2, p. 9.) [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:24 am
One of the earliest examples is Hahn v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:24 pm
One of the earliest examples is Hahn v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:43 am
Bradford J. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Supp. 2d 992, 1199–1200 (E.D.N.Y. 2006), rev’d on other grounds, 522 F.3d 215 (2d Cir. 2008) (describing confounding in studies of low-tar cigarettes, where authors failed to account for confounding and assessing healthier life styles in users) Third Circuit In re Zoloft Prods. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:45 pm
The European Commission’s legislative proposal for a carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) covers the energy intensive trade exposed (EITE) sectors of steel and aluminium, amongst others, and will ‘restrict market access for non-participants that do not meet standards for low-carbon intensity’ starting in 2026. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:46 pm
The question before the court on Tuesday in Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 4:01 am
”[10] The issue of “healing” is effectively discarded in R. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL. (1991). [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 3:14 pm
The lawsuit, Bradford v. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am
Kris recommended the recent CSIS report by Jennifer Daskal and Will Carter: “Low-Hanging Fruit: Evidence-Based Solutions to the Digital Evidence Challenge. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 8:14 am
Bradford Batcha, Esq. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:29 pm
Fox v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:44 am
This post and the previous one are an expansion upon a post that I wrote with Dr. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 5:00 am
In its recent decision in the case of Rohe v. [read post]
