Search for: "Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 66
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
When is the use of a product a “substantial noninfringing use” for purposes of Section 271(c)?
11 Dec 2023, 7:43 am by Holman
Gateway, Inc., 580 F.3d 1301, 1320 (Fed. [read post]
Patently-O - https://patentlyo.com
Implications of the Updated IEEE IPR Policy for FRAND royalty rate determination
7 Oct 2022, 8:02 am by OxFirst
” Shortly after, the same reasoning would be echoed in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
IP Finance - http://www.ip.finance/?m=1
Big Win for Qualcomm in the Ninth Circuit
4 Sep 2020, 12:15 pm by Unknown
Cir. 2018) (some alterations in original) (quoting Lucent Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
IP Finance - http://www.ip.finance/?m=1
Mixed result in Finjan case
10 Jan 2018, 6:36 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
”Lucent Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
"Patent Reform that only China Would Want": right conclusion; wrong arguments
18 Dec 2014, 6:09 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The case -- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
UGG: Default Judgment and Treble Damages Entered Against Defendant Where Defendant Failed to Participate in Discovery
26 Aug 2014, 5:18 am
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
Mixed result in Alcon v. Barr: no infringement and no invalidity
20 Mar 2014, 7:48 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Lucent Tech., Inc. v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
The Federal Circuit Table of Authorities
1 Apr 2013, 9:11 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2010) (en banc) Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent
Judge 'skeptical' of FRAND position Google's Motorola will present at Microsoft trial
23 Oct 2012, 12:35 pm by Florian Mueller
Judge Robart particularly relies on the Federal Circuit's Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
FOSS Patents - http://www.fosspatents.com
Oh Frak - Survey Evidence Not Admissible
16 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Michael C. Smith
” Id.; see also Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice - http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/
Cross-Licenses and Outbound Agreements Concerning Accused Technology Deemed Discoverable
8 Aug 2012, 10:53 am by The Docket Navigator
"District court decisions in this Circuit both before and after [Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
Docket Report Patent Infringement Blog - http://docketreport.blogspot.com/
Past Licenses for Patents-NOT-in-Suit Relevant to a Reasonable Royalty
17 May 2012, 9:04 pm by Charles Bieneman
” Two recent Federal Circuit cases discussing the evidentiary bases required for the Georgia Pacific factors, Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
Software Intellectual Property Report - http://swipreport.com/
Excessive Jury Award Reduced From $70 Million to $26.3 Million
15 Nov 2011, 6:02 am by The Docket Navigator
" Lucent Technologies, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
Docket Report Patent Infringement Blog - http://docketreport.blogspot.com/
Online Global Week in Review 22 July 2011 from IP Think Tank
21 Jul 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
Gateway, Inc., et. al. [read post]
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/ipthinktank.blog
District Court Finds that Damages Expert's "Alternative Analysis" was Not Based on Sound Economic Principles
15 Jul 2011, 5:44 am by The Docket Navigator
" Lucent Technologies, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
Docket Report Patent Infringement Blog - http://docketreport.blogspot.com/
Plaintiff's Expert Precluded from Testifying on Entire Market Value Rule Where Basis for Consumer Demand Was Not Shown
1 Jul 2011, 8:49 am
Gateway, Inc., 580 F.3d 1301, 1336 (Fed. [read post]
Patent Lawyer Blog - http://patentlaw.jmbm.com/
Online Global Week in Review 1 July 2011 from IP Think Tank
1 Jul 2011, 1:43 am by Marie Louise
(IPblog) Lucent Technologies – Third party software add-in cannot be used as proxy for valuing patented software component: Lucent Technologies, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/ipthinktank.blog
Third Party Software Add-In Cannot be Used as Proxy for Valuing Patented Software Component
23 Jun 2011, 7:52 am by The Docket Navigator
[W]ithout evidence that there is a market for this add-in, the add-ins analysis does not meet the requirement for damages being based on 'sound economic and factual predicates.'" Lucent Technologies, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
Docket Report Patent Infringement Blog - http://docketreport.blogspot.com/
Damages Expert's "Real World" Negotiation Methodology Did Not Violate Guidelines for Conducting Hypothetical Negotiation
20 Jun 2011, 7:39 am by The Docket Navigator
" Lucent Technologies, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
Docket Report Patent Infringement Blog - http://docketreport.blogspot.com/
Commercial Success
13 Jun 2011, 8:58 pm
As discussed in Lucent Technologies, Inc., v. [read post]
Patent Prospector - http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/