Search for: "M. ROBINSON" Results 1 - 20 of 1,470
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2024, 11:30 am by Guest Blogger
  I’m excited to make this point because it’s one I haven’t made before in a professional setting. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Evan George
I’m heartened by state action plans. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:16 am by admin
“Give me your phone, because I’m going to put it in the back seat,” he said. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:52 am by Yosi Yahoudai
She has recorded a series on resilience for a meditation app and has a podcast with her husband, Christopher Robinson, and an upcoming limited series on her struggles within the Italian legal system for Hulu that has Monica Lewinsky as an executive producer. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 9:25 am by David Badertscher
Paul H Robinson* and Sarah M Robinson capture this thought in their book, “American Criminal Law: Its People, Principles, and Evolution” (Routledge 2022). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:54 am by Daniel J. Gilman
  Last week, I suggested that: while the report doesn’t quite say so, Chair Khan’s open-meeting remarks made clear that she’s wondering if there might be some good Robinson-Patman cases in this area. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
   David Boyd, UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and the Environment has recently summarized and reflected on th quite interesting case recently decided by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in Habitantes de La Oroya Vs. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:51 am by Dan Bressler
In this BRB jobs update, I’m pleased to highlight an open role at Robinson+Cole, coming in from Jim Merrifield, the firm’s Director of Information Governance & Business Intake (who also produces “InfoGov Hotseat” for IG readers who might want to check out his interview series.) [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 5:22 am by Yosi Yahoudai
According to research from Texas A&M, pigs are the most prolific large mammals on earth. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]