Search for: "MALHOTRA v. MALHOTRA"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 3:55 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
On 1 November 2022, there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm
On the same day Nicklin J handed down the judgment in Riley v Murray [2020] EWHC 997 (QB). [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 8:02 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm
Malhotra is wrongly decided on SSRN. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 8:00 am
También tendrán presentaciones vía Skype. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:23 am
Pranesh further criticized the decision of Justice Manmohan Singh of the Delhi High Court in John Wiley v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 11:00 am
M/s Harbans Lal Malhotra & Sons Pvt. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:01 am
It also presented the publishers’ view, which is apparently, dubbing the course-pack system as commercial exploitation and piracy instead of educational fair use, all in the name of protecting the rights of the content creators and publishers, as was voiced by Sudhir Malhotra, president of the Federation of Indian Publishers (FIP). [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:32 am
This is “differentiation v integration”. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 10:18 pm
Next it was Aparajita’s turn to come up with an incisive case review of Lupin Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 3:37 am
Union of India v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 3:14 am
Corp. v HRH Constr. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
Joshi and others v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 12:40 am
MALHOTRA & INDU MALHOTRA, THE LAW AND PRACTICE OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION 1175 (2006)]. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:55 pm
Working Papers, CDDRL Stanford http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/22693/No_103_Sarma_India_Arbitration_India_509.pdf[ii] Malhotra, O.P and Indu, The Law and Practice of Arbitration and Conciliation, Lexis Nexis, 2nd Edn. at page 63 [iii]Discussing the intent behind introducing Section 89 in the Code, the Supreme Court in Salem Advocate Bar Association v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 7:21 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Indira GandhiThe case of the day is Sikhs for Justice v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
On 21 December 2011, Eady J gave judgment in the “harassment” case of Neocleous v Jones ([2011] EWHC 3459 (QB)) Two judgments were also given in relation to “phone hacking indemnity” claims, Coulson v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3482 (QB)) and Mulcaire v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3469 (Ch)). [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
LLC v. [read post]
