Search for: "MARRIAGE OF KENNEDY" Results 1 - 20 of 1,374
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2024, 9:56 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
Sometimes, for example as in the case of the Court of Appeal, the different judicial divisions may reach different opinions on subjects ranging from marriage to child custody, service of processes, and enforcement of awards and judgments. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(involving the question whether an allegedly biological father could assert parental rights as to a child born into the marriage of a woman and a different man).But many Court watchers seem to think that with the addition of Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett to the Court, there is now a durable majority to deploy some form of these concepts more routinely and more ambitiously. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
As noted in a recent decision from New York, Matter of Kennedy v. 3rd Track Constructors , 213 A.D.3d 1005, 182 N.Y.S.3d 803 (3d Dept. 2023) [see § 39.03, n. 23.3], the imposition of disqualification penalties must be proportionate to the unethical conduct. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 3:47 pm
 The NLJ reports Retired Justice Kennedy To Release Memoirs This Fall -- Anthony Kennedy will offer his perspective on "major decisions on abortion, affirmative action, freedom of speech, gay marriage, separation of powers, and federalism," Simon & Schuster stated.Retired U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 10:50 am by Megan Dell
Throughout your marriage, you did not have financial difficulties because you and your spouse earned nice incomes. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
“Far from seeking to devalue marriage,” Justice Anthony Kennedy responded for the majority in Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:23 am
Kennedy (Dissolution of marriage; motion for modification; alimony; child support; abuse of discretion) Marshall v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Kennedy Jr. padded its account with millions of dollars in contributions from one of the best-known private security executives in the country, Gavin de Becker. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:49 am by jonathanturley
The Free Speech Coalition, Justice Kennedy in a 6-3 decision found that the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 was “overbroad” and swept within its prohibitions many valuable and artistic works. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:32 am by Amy Howe
The conversion therapy question came to the Supreme Court in the case of Brian Tingley, a Washington marriage and family counselor. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm by Legal Aggregate
Casey, coauthored with Justices Kennedy and Souter), and affirmative action (2003’s Grutter v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm by Sasha Volokh
[Serial-blogging my recent article in the Notre Dame Law Review] On Monday, I started serial-blogging my article, The Myth of the Federal Private Nondelegation Doctrine, which has just come out in the Notre Dame Law Review. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:59 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Kennedy, 418 NE 2d 947 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1981 Furthermore, if the franchises that were started after the marriage were purchased using premarital funds from the older businesses, those newer businesses may be non-marital property as well. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:30 am by Pat Gudridge
Hodges, Supreme Court recognition of same-sex marriages as due process-protected too. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 6:11 am by Mark Ashton
” Glassware, flatware, Quimper, scarves, kid gloves (think Jackie Kennedy), toy cap guns, princess phone keychains and marbles. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm by Russell Knight
” In re Custody of McCuan, 531 NE 2d 102 – Ill: Appellate Court, 5th Dist. 1988 “In view of [one spouse’s] much greater ability to pay, we think it was an abuse of discretion to make [the other spouse] pay most of the [children’s] attorney’s fees” In re Marriage of Kennedy, 418 NE 2d 947 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1981 Guardian Ad Litem fees seem to have no limit beyond what the court deems “reasonable. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am by Josh Blackman
"It's perfectly clear that nobody in 1868 thought that the 14th Amendment was going to protect the right to same-sex marriage," he says. [read post]