Search for: "MATTER OF M E M" Results 1 - 20 of 7,367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2024, 8:30 am by Norman L. Eisen
” Krebbeks said himself during sentencing that “I’m not admitting guilt, because I still don’t think I’m guilty. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 3:07 pm
New Mexico “a dead letter”: “[E]very testimonial lab report could come into evidence through any trained surrogate, however remote from the case. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:11 am by Dan Bressler
For over 75 years, our firm has harnessed these strengths to offer fresh perspectives on each matter we advise, litigate, mediate, and negotiate. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm by Administrator
In Canada, nearly half of women and a third of men have experienced intimate partner violence and rates are on the rise.[1] What was once thought to be a private matter is now properly recognized for its widespread and intergenerational effects. [2] The issue before the court is not whether intimate partner violence exists. [read post]
Louboutin extended e-commerce platform liability to include the hybrid scenario where platform operators provided their own offers as well as third parties’. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 4:20 am by Greg Lambert
And the E FF really stepped up and said, Hey, maybe you should have some rules around this, that actually protect things like privacy. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
The plaintiff’s claim relied on Delaware precedent holding that governance restrictions in an agreement (as opposed to the corporation’s certificate of incorporation) are invalid if they either directly or indirectly “remove from directors in a very substantial way their duty to use their own best judgment on management matters” or “substantially limit the freedom of director decisions on matters of management policy. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 11:49 am by Kevin
For all you people who think fonts don’t matter … well, you’re usually right, but not always. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:40 pm by Guest Author
“[W]e are hardly at liberty to override the plain, expansive language of Section 6(g),” Judge Wright wrote, as “ambiguous legislative history cannot change the express legislative intent. [read post]