Search for: "MATTER OF SAYLOR" Results 1 - 20 of 112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2024, 7:12 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
7292163 CLIFTON 7289981 SOFT ARCHITECTURE 7289151 SAYLOR 7262410 DOLMAN 7263447 REALDEF 7279544 ARCHDALE 7285583 TOXIC WASTE 7287241 KEEPIN’ IT SOUR 7287242 TAKE THE TOXIC CHALLENGE 7287357 7279823 SPENIO 7279442 BEASTWIRE 7288715 LYUMJEV 7293993 KIB 7295045 ZURA 7258387 TOOL PLANET 7268804 PHMP 7270588 TRU STEEL HD 7270590 TRU STEEL HD SDI YOU CAN SEE THE DIFFERENCE. 7270512 SOULSTIR 7273894 CONNECT ALLEN COUNTY 7283232 ÏHOLA CHE! [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 9:55 pm by Cari Rincker
In contracts, as in business, it is the small details that can matter most. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm
Jan. 24, 2023 Saylor, S.J.), a trial court judge addressed a Defendant's post-trial motions following the entry of a jury verdict in favor of the Plaintiff against three (3) Defendants in a personal injury civil litigation matter. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:58 pm
"While the court has considerable sympathy for the people of Mexico, and none whatsoever for those who traffic guns to Mexican criminal organizations, it is duty-bound to follow the law," Saylor wrote in a 44-page decision. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"] From Justice Christine Donohue's majority opinion (joined by Chief Justice Max Baer and Justices Thomas Saylor and David Wecht) in In the Interest of Y.W. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:04 am
.), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court reaffirmed the continuing validity of the sudden emergency doctrine for motor vehicle accident matters in Pennsylvania. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 6:47 am by Erica Blachman Hitchings
Other Copay Fraud Cases Throughout the opinion, the court cites favorably to the holdings of other courts who denied motions to dismiss in similar matters. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 1:49 pm
Finally, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court also held that the policy’s coordination of benefits provision for unstacked UIM coverage did not apply absent a valid waiver of inter-policy stacking.Having answered the questions presented, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ordered that the matter be returned to the Third Circuit for further proceedings.Anyone wishing to review the Majority Opinion by Justice Baer may click this LINK.The Concurring Opinion by Justice Wecht can be… [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
" Justice Christine Donohue dissented as well: I strongly disagree that, as a matter of law, anyone accepting employment as a nanny forfeits his or her right of privacy in the child's bedroom. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Jan. 20, 2021) (Op. by Saylor, C.J.), the court addressed the current status of the law in Pennsylvania regarding res judicata and the collateral estoppel doctrine in a case involving a tax appeal. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:15 am by Eugene Volokh
As a general matter, it is well-settled that protecting a minor from psychological and physical harm serves an important governmental interest, in fact, in many circumstances, a compelling state interest. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
It remains to be seen how the COVID-19 pandemic will influence jury awards.Stay of Civil Litigation Matters Pending Result of Criminal CaseIn a case of first impression handed down in March in the matter of Keesee v. [read post]
” Pennsylvania Supreme Court Chief Justice Saylor also issued a concurring and dissenting statement, in which he too affirmed the court’s ruling. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 2:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
[The claim was brought by the Trump campaign; the decision appears to be 4-3 as to some matters, 7-0 as to others.] [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 1:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
(Saylor, C.J. and Mundy, J., Dissenting), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held, as a matter of first impression, that Uber “controlled and directed the performance of Lowman’s services as a driver-for-hire” and that Mr. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:57 am by Dan Bressler
Saylor also allegedly said that assistance and discipline was necessary because Baldwin ’caused us a lot of trouble when she was on the Supreme Court with her minority agenda.'” [read post]