Search for: "MILBURN v. MILBURN."
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2023, 3:50 am
Further, except where there is deceit directed against a court, Judiciary Law § 487 “applies only to wrongful conduct by an attorney in an action that is actually pending” (Mahler v Campagna, 60 AD3d 1009, 1012-1013; see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178; Meimeteas v Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, 105 AD3d 643, 643). [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 11:43 am
Accord, Milburn v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 5:10 am
The court properly denied defendant’s motions for leave to amend because the defects in the original pleading were not cured by either of the proposed amendments (Meimeteas v Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, 105 AD3d 643 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 4:08 am
In November of 2016, Bical engaged Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP (“CLM”) to replace his then-current counsel. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:09 am
Honda has vigorously denied that it is liable and has announced that it will be appealing Milburn v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 5:00 am
In the case of Mitchell v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 9:48 am
Milburn (2017) 398 P.3d 486 (Or. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 7:52 am
The Supreme Court's request for views from the Solicitor General in Ariosa Diagnostics v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:37 am
In Alexander Milburn Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 1:22 pm
Alexander Milburn Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 11:20 am
There are several important prior cases on-point: Alexander Milburn Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:12 am
Additionally, plaintiff has not alleged any proximately caused damages or identified any damages sustained as a result of Brecher’s alleged conflict of interest, which did not arise in the course of a judicial proceeding and thus is not actionable under the statute (see Meimeteas v Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, 105 AD3d 643 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:12 pm
As Justice Holmes said in Milburn, ‘The delays of the patent office ought not to cut down the effect of what has been done. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:25 am
Additionally, plaintiff has not alleged any proximately caused damages or identified any damages sustained as a result of Brecher’s alleged conflict of interest, which did not arise in the course of a judicial proceeding and thus is not actionable under the statute (see Meimeteas v Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, 105 AD3d 643 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:26 pm
From Dynamic Drinkware v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 2:48 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today (Minhas v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
To be recoverable, a medical expense must be both incurred and reasonable.Howell v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm
In Estelle v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:10 am
In last week’s case (Milburn v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:42 am
Here, in Meimeteas v Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP ;2012 NY Slip Op 30134(U) ;January 12, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County; Docket Number: 100857/11 ;Judge: Eileen A. [read post]
