Search for: "MINTZ v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 10:02 am
Copan Italia S.p.A. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[15] The court found that Third Circuit precedents, Hays and Co v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:31 pm
China imposed more fines on the Beijing arm of Mintz Group, saying the New York-based due-diligence firm failed to respond to earlier penalties meted out over allegedly unapproved statistical work. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Further, observed the Appellate Division, "plaintiffs in retaliation cases are held to a lenient pleading standard and are generally afforded deference at the pleading stage, citing Thomas v Mintz, 182 AD3d 490 and Petit v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 177 AD3d 402. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Further, observed the Appellate Division, "plaintiffs in retaliation cases are held to a lenient pleading standard and are generally afforded deference at the pleading stage, citing Thomas v Mintz, 182 AD3d 490 and Petit v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 177 AD3d 402. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Historians appear prominently in the Supreme Court's decision in Haaland v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Steven Mintz on Rights Talk (IHE Blog). [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
(Yu v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 12:00 pm
Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 3:37 pm
In Greer v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:26 am
On May 4, the Israeli Supreme Court, sitting as a High Court of Justice (HCJ), issued its long-awaited judgment in Abu Aram v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:43 pm
”); Mintz v. [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 9:15 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) similarly requires... [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 9:15 am
The Federal Circuit has repeatedly confirmed that secondary consideration evidence is an integral part of an obviousness analysis (indeed, it “may be the most pertinent, probative, and revealing evidence available to the decision maker in reaching a conclusion on the obviousness/nonobviousness issue”) and thus has mandated consideration of such evidence in assessing obviousness (Mintz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 10:20 am
The case is Matorin v. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 12:30 am
Over at Jotwell, Reuel Schiller reviews Sarah Milov's The Cigarette: A Political History (The Cigarette and the State).The Federal Judicial Center has been "live-tweeting" Schenck v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 6:56 am
On Feb. 9, the Israeli Supreme Court handed down its judgement in Katz v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
FTC v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
Plaintiff commenced this action against defendant for breach of contract, an account stated, quantum meruit and unjust enrichment. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 1:35 pm
In light of recent state laws and appellate court decisions at both the federal and state level in 2017, choice of venue and choice of law provisions must be carefully considered and strategically implemented. [read post]
