Search for: "MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS R. CO. v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Tyler Hoguet
LoMonte of the University of Georgia School of Law and Paola Fiku of the Brechner Center for the Advancement of the First Amendment contend in an article in the University of Missouri Kansas City Law Review. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am by Kevin Kaufman
Kansas, for example, is one of several states imposing a three-bracket income tax system. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
While it is traditionally tough to get Congress to police itself, Spanberger and her co-lead on the legislation, U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
   The BroadbandUSA Newsletter for September includes notable state news from Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, Kentucky, and Kansas (among others). [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Like Texas, the Kansas legislature passed a ban on standard D&E abortions, the method used in 95% of second-trimester abortions. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:30 am by Patricia McConnico
Pavement Salvage Co., 396 U.S. 57 (1969); Sakraids v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:08 am by Robin Shea
On a related note, I saw in yesterday’s Washington Post that there is a pay gap in tech jobs in Kansas City, Missouri, and Arlington, Texas — in those cities, women earn more than the men do. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
P v Q v R ~P­­­_____ ∴ Q v R ~Q­­­_____ ∴ R Hence, the term, “iterative disjunctive syllogism. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 4:24 am by Kathy Kapusta
” The lower court, however, failed to consider the Supreme Court’s subsequent decision in Tilton v Missouri Pacific Railroad Co, in which the High Court found that McKinney “did not adopt a rule of absolute foreseeability. [read post]