Search for: "MOORE v. RICK" Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
Term Limits v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
Term Limits v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
SLS Faculty Weigh In on Recent SCOTUS Decisions in Roundup of the 2022-2023 Term
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
Moore v. [read post]
Legal Aggregate - https://law.stanford.edu/legal-aggregate/
On “That Trippi Show” with Joe Trippi: “The biggest bullet dodged in the history of democracy” with Rick Hasen
7 Jul 2023, 7:33 am by Rick Hasen
Joe Trippi podcast: Was the Supreme Court decision in Moore v. [read post]
Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/
The Year of "To be Continued" at the Supreme Court
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
But two things are clear: 1) the Court's explicit approval of Bush v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
Watch Archived Video of the Safeguarding Democracy Project Flash Webinar: “U.S. Democracy and the Independent State Legislature Theory after the Supreme Court’s Moore v. Harper Decision”
29 Jun 2023, 2:20 pm by Rick Hasen
Democracy and the Independent State Legislature Theory after the Supreme Court’s Moore v. [read post]
Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/
Moore v. Harper & the need for clarity
28 Jun 2023, 4:19 am by Ned Foley
Rick worries, however, that yesterday’s decision… Continue reading The post Moore v. [read post]
Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/
Trump is the Biggest Loser in Moore v. Harper
27 Jun 2023, 9:34 am by Michael C. Dorf
Donald Trump wasn't a party or an amicus in Moore v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
What happens to Moore v. Harper after the latest North Carolina Supreme Court decision in the partisan gerrymandering case?
28 Apr 2023, 10:04 am by Derek Muller
Earlier, I blogged about how “mootness”… Continue reading The post What happens to Moore v. [read post]
Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/
“Final judgment,” not mootness, at issue in latest Moore v. Harper twist
2 Mar 2023, 2:47 pm by Derek Muller
Rick H. links to the Supreme Court’s order in Moore v. [read post]
Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/
Morning Docket: 02.07.23
7 Feb 2023, 5:54 am by Joe Patrice
[Reuters] * Professor Rick Hasen discusses the high likelihood that Moore v. [read post]
Above the Law - http://abovethelaw.com/
A practical reason for the North Carolina Supreme Court to expedite rehearing of its partisan gerrymandering decision
6 Feb 2023, 10:35 am by Derek Muller
’s perspective on the issue of potential mootness in Moore v. [read post]
Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/
“North Carolina Supreme Court Grants Rehearing in Case Striking Down Congressional Districts as a Partisan Gerrymander, Potentially Mooting U.S. Supreme Court’s Independent State Legislature Case, Moore v. Harper”
3 Feb 2023, 5:37 pm by Howard Bashman
Supreme Court’s Independent State Legislature Case, Moore v. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
News Roundup
6 Jan 2023, 6:56 am by Jeff Welty
” The status of the morning after pill has been a key issue since the Supreme Court overruled Roe v. [read post]
North Carolina Criminal Law Blog - http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/
The morning read for Thursday, Dec. 8
8 Dec 2022, 7:34 am by SCOTUSblog
Here’s the Thursday morning read: Takeaways from Moore v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
“What Difference Would It Make If the Supreme Court in the Moore v. Harper Case Embraced the Bush v. Gore Concurrence Rather Than a Full-Throated Independent State Legislature Theory?”
7 Dec 2022, 7:15 pm by Howard Bashman
“What Difference Would It Make If the Supreme Court in the Moore v. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
A Few Thoughts on Moore v. Harper Oral Argument
7 Dec 2022, 1:04 pm by Guy Charles
My guess is… Continue reading The post A Few Thoughts on Moore v. [read post]
Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/
(Rick Hasen) Live-Blogging the Supreme Court’s Oral Arguments in the Moore v. Harper (Independent State Legislature); Now UPDATED with Analysis and Reason to Think Court Will Reject Maximalist Version of ISLT
7 Dec 2022, 9:58 am by Rick Hasen
UPDATE: After almost three hours of oral argument, a divided Supreme Court appeared searching for a middle ground to hold that in really egregious cases state courts can violate the federal constitution when they apply… Continue reading The post (Rick Hasen) Live-Blogging the Supreme Court’s Oral Arguments in the Moore v. [read post]
Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/
“Congress,” the Presentment Clauses, and Moore v. Harper
24 Oct 2022, 12:37 pm by Derek Muller
I appreciate the posts from Professor Rick Pildes and Professor Michael Herz on the nature of “Congress” under the Elections Clause, but I take a different approach. [read post]
Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/
Epic Games has a strong tying theory against Apple, but a remand is more likely than direct entry of liability by the Ninth Circuit
15 Oct 2022, 10:00 am by Florian Mueller
One is that Microsoft itself faced a tying claim in one of the most famous U.S. antitrust cases, which is precedent that both parties are citing now in Epic v. [read post]
FOSS Patents - http://www.fosspatents.com