Search for: "Maine v. Strange"
Results 1 - 20
of 323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2024, 1:20 am
Elien Verniers, Strasbourg Observers: Executief van de Moslims van België and Others v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Frank Cranmer’s case note on the decision superbly summarises the facts, the various grounds argued and the main findings of the detailed judgment. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
He successfully argued New York Times v. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The Sequel to Doe v. Mills: Justice Barrett Tightens The Screws On The Shadow Docket
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm
Because administrative stays are necessarily the "short-lived prelude to the main event. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
Recognizing the worst in government transparency. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 10:44 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
[I will blog the NetChoice v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:48 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
At the Atlantic, Adam Serwer critiques Justice Thomas's analysis of the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause in the Court's Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 7:05 am
After the Supreme Court decided California v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
Laufer didn’t plan to visit Acheson Hotels’ property on Maine’s southern coast. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
Assn. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:30 am
According to Solum:[I]n Bradwell v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:31 am
It would be strange enough for Congress to allow state [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Many years ago, I got into a strange sort of contretemps with Judge Harry Edwards of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
Historical Practice and AUMF Interpretation The idea that subsequent practice should bear on how one interprets a statute is, in many ways, a strange one. [read post]