Search for: "Mark Dobbs" Results 1 - 20 of 252
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Sachs, Dobbs and the Originalists, (Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Forthcoming).Mark Satta, The Supreme Court’s Refusal to Acknowledge Sexual-Orientation Discrimination in 303 Creative v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Mark Kende (Drake University Law School) has posted The U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Howard Friedman
British and Canadian Public Law in Comparative Perspective (Hart 2021)).Mark Kende, The U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
    THE GREAT LEAKMost of us lived through the mysterious leaking of the Dobbs decision but this was not the first leak of a landmark and controversial Court decision. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Even if not, because it was based on state rather than federal law, it has no direct application beyond Indiana or to people who cannot sincerely claim a religious basis for seeking an abortion.Nonetheless, the ruling marks an important milestone in the legal battle over abortion. [read post]
Lee celebrated the Dobbs decision in 2022, claiming it marked the start of a “hopeful, new chapter for our country. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 7:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The FDA does not enforce Comstock (and Comstock was clearly unenforceable prior to the Dobbs decision). [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:45 am by Marcia Coyle
“Our decision returns the issue of abortion to those legislative bodies,” wrote Justice Samuel Alito, author of the 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Federal: The NLRB holds that an employer violated the National Labor Relations Act when it discharged an employee for refusing to remove the hand-drawn letters "BLM"—the acronym for Black Lives Matter—from their work apron, finding that the employee's refusal to remove the BLM marking was a protected concerted activity under Section 7 of the NLRA. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
Mitchell and his colleague, the preacher Mark Lee Dickson, have written the Comstock Act into local ordinances they describe as creating “sanctuary cities for the unborn. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:19 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Perhaps the thre-justice opinion's citations to the Chief's separate Dobbs opinion and Breyer's Bush v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Federal: The NLRB holds that an employer violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) when it discharged an employee for refusing to remove the hand-drawn letters “BLM”—the acronym for Black Lives Matter—from their work apron, finding that the employee’s refusal to remove the BLM marking was a protected concerted activity under Section 7 of the NLRA. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
 Pix credit here The majority’s choice of a different path leaves the remaining Justices with a choice of how to respond. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
              Dobbs is a recent example. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Historians, reading the case forward from the Nineteenth Amendment, are more likely to remember Adkins as marking a fork in the road between Alice Paul and Florence Kelley. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
[Justice Jackson explained that an ambiguous text should be interpreted in favor of expanding democracy. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday in what is shaping up to be the biggest election case since its ruling nearly 25 years ago in Bush v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 3:13 am by Ellena Erskine
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: White House tells Supreme Court diversity at West Point key to winning wars (Kelsey Reichmann, Courthouse News Service)  Abortion Pill Supreme Court Case Gets Wave of Support for FDA (Ian Lopez, Bloomberg Law) Exclusive: UNC pays anti-affirmative action group $4.8 million after US Supreme Court loss (Nate Raymond, Reuters) ACLU warns Supreme Court that lower court abortion pill decisions relied on “patently unreliable witnesses” (Melissa… [read post]