Search for: "Marks v. James*"
Results 1 - 20
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am
Goldston (@JamesAGoldston) (January 31, 2024) Why the ICJ Ruling Misses the Mark: Mitigating Civilian Harm With An Enemy Engaged in Human Shielding By Claire O. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 8:24 am
Israel-Hamas War Between Rhetoric and Effects: The ICJ Provisional Measures Order in South Africa v. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 7:11 am
App. 3d 416, 423 (2004) (Internal quotation marks omitted.) [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 8:55 am
., Davison v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Mark Haight 51. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:15 am
(@tgrahamjr) (January 24, 2022) Sanctions and Economic Consequences Climate Security, Energy Security, and the Russia-Ukraine Warby Mark Nevitt (@marknevitt) (May 11, 2022) Why Proposals for U.S. to Liquidate and Use… [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Perhaps this next Supreme Court term, in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:55 pm
The Court in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 12:00 pm
V. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 3:03 pm
I am not sure why Percheron chose to send you and Mark this letter. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 3:15 am
The Supreme Court of Canada simplifies the standard of review analysis in historic Super Bowl trilogy https://t.co/HNcpK4qXYK 2019-12-22 EU High Court Rules Against Digital Resale; We’ll Talk About This at the Conference https://t.co/SYM5ATw238 2019-12-22 Enersen not enforced in Wilson v Huuge, 9th Circ. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 3:15 am
The Supreme Court of Canada simplifies the standard of review analysis in historic Super Bowl trilogy https://t.co/HNcpK4qXYK 2019-12-22 EU High Court Rules Against Digital Resale; We’ll Talk About This at the Conference https://t.co/SYM5ATw238 2019-12-22 Enersen not enforced in Wilson v Huuge, 9th Circ. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:58 am
Hollingsworth and Mark A. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:41 am
Cir.2016) (internal quotation marks omitted); see 13A CharlesAlan Wright & Arthur R. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:50 am
In this issue Prof Karjiker provides his perspective on Herbal Zone v Infitech, a triumvirate of talent from CIPC (Sher-Muhammad Kahn, Christiaan Steyn and Warren Rossouw) unpack shape marks in a comprehensive exposé, Chezanne Haighfrom Kisch IP takes a bite at the Kit Kat four finger decision, Darren Olivier provides tips for franchising, Alessia del Bianco provides an in-house perspective on creative IP management, Darren Margo is relaxed over the latest exchange… [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:53 am
King, 2017 FC 246 Bell Canada v ITVBOX.NET2016 FC 612 Wesley dba MTLFREETV.com v Bell Canada et al 2017 FCA 55 Filmspeler, ECLI:EU:C:2017:300, 26 April, 2017 Trader v CarGurus, 2017 ONSC1841 2251723 Ontario Inc. v Bell Canada, 2016 ONSC 7273 GS Media, C‑160/15, EU:C:2016:644 Mackie v Maxi Construction Ltd [2017]Scot 11 (7 Mar. 2017) Geophysical Service Incorporated v EnCana Corporation, 2017 ABCA 125 Trade-marks/Domain Names… [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm
Acceptance of the writ, which is rare, would mean the two DeCoster v. [read post]
