Search for: "Marks v. Mobil Oil Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
Mann, against National Review magazine, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and Mark Steyn.[1] Back in 2014, I commented upon the oddity of a scientist’s claim of defamation against lay people for criticizing a scientist’s work.[2] Mann took umbrage to statements, critical of his work that generated a “hockey-stick” model of global temperature rises. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
The Biden administration accused the Russian government of helping Iran’s blacklisted military unit — the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps — sell hundreds of millions of dollars of oil around the globe, while the sanctions were targeted at those companies and individuals allegedly involved in the smuggling. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Teresa Chen, Alana Nance, Han-ah Sumner
The three islands, known as Mischief Reef (Chinese: Měijì Jiāo; Filipino: Panganiban Reef; Vietnamese: Đá Vành Khăn), Subi Reef (Chinese: Zhǔbì Jiāo; Filipino: Zamora Reef; Vietnamese: Đá Su Bi), and Fiery Cross Reef (Chinese: Yǒngshǔ Jiāo; Filipino: Kagitingan Reef; Vietnamese: Đá Chữ Thập), were once low-tide elevations (LTEs), defined by UNCLOS Article 13 as naturally formed areas… [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:56 am by Dennis Crouch
The Supreme Court pushed-back again on functional claims–perhaps most notably in Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
The FDA acknowledges, for instance, that the acceptable intake is set to mark “a small theoretical increase in risk,” and a “highly hypothetical concept that should not be regarded as a realistic indication of the actual risk,” and thus not an actual risk.[9] The corresponding hypothetical or theoretical risk to the acceptable intake level is clearly small when compared with the human’s lifetime probability of developing cancer (which the FDA states is greater… [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
The seeds of most of them can also be found in the Supreme Court's crucial holding in Kewanee Oil Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 3:15 am
Matosantos Commercial Corp., Opposition No. 91218800 [Opposition to registration of the mark shown below left, in view of the registered mark shown below right, both for for "toilet paper," on the grounds of likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d) and false association under Section 2(a)]. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 6:08 am by Dennis Crouch
Supreme Court in Kewanee Oil Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:32 am by SHG
Mobil Oil Corp., 7 NY3d 434, 446-47 (2006), quoting People v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Bayer Corp., 727 F.3d 300 (3d Cir. 2013), and Marcus v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:08 pm by Eric Goldman
Mark McKenna: The Implications of Blackhorse v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Canada’s top oil firms, governments grabbed seismic data property http://t.co/5OBItJTue1 -> Google Inc facing heat from Competition Bureau over alleged anti-competitive behaviour http://t.co/c9WVQXeT8S -> Supreme Court decision on damages for wrongful dismissal http://t.co/6947ATpZeR -> Online Copyright Infringement – UK Music http://t.co/H3OLrSlv3d -> Copyright compromise keeps UK internet archive offline http://t.co/FnjdBh4RZ6 -> Game publishers vow to help… [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
News South Africa http://t.co/vTAbTl2WSm -> Verizon’s bid to kill network neutrality law goes to court Monday http://t.co/sn9MZXE1su -> Discovery to obtain IP addresses in bitTorerrent case permitted POUNDS PICTURES. v DOES 1-17, ED Tenn 2013http://t.co/IAgXsl4g2e -> Link to American Institute of Physics v. [read post]