Search for: "Martin v. Campbell" Results 1 - 20 of 138
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 A school district’s discretion to remove material from its collection, however, must be exercised within “fundamental constitutional safeguards” (Campbell v St. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 A school district’s discretion to remove material from its collection, however, must be exercised within “fundamental constitutional safeguards” (Campbell v St. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 2:35 am by centerforartlaw
In AWF v Goldsmith, the US Supreme Court clarified that not all works which add “new expression, meaning, or message”[15] will be considered ‘transformative’ by the law, since this would conflict with the copyright holder’s “exclusive right to prepare derivative works,” effectively rendering it useless. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:51 pm by Shea Denning
Campbell, 368 N.C. 83 (2015), the failure to allege the full or proper legal name of the victim did not render a larceny indictment fatally defective, see State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm by David Kopel
It is co-authored by Campbell University law professor Gregory Wallace, who has published two articles on "assault weapons," most recently "Assault Weapon" Lethality, 88 Tenn. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
Martin Fackler, military trauma surgeon, former director of the Army's Wound Ballistics Laboratory, an [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am by CMS
Today’s live blog team comprises Jessica Eaton, Charlotte Edgar, Sophie Campbell, Natalie Haefner, Amelia Mah, and Brooke Nisbet. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post is co-authored by Campbell University law professor Gregory Wallace. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
On 9 July 2021 Kenneth Martin J handed down judgment in the case of Nguyen v Hinsley [2021] WASC 220, striking out multiple parts of the defence and counterclaim, with leave to replead. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
New Zealand In the case of Staples v [2021] NZHC 1308 [pdf] Doogue J awarded $350,000 in damages following allegations made by Winston Peters and a gang-linked debt collector which were then broadcast on TV show Campbell Live. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 11:04 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction Evaluating the Federal R&D ax Credit Effectiveness of the R&D Tax Credit — Does the R&D Credit Increase R&D Spending? [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm by Adam Faderewski
Campbell, 77, of Bulverde, died June 30, 2020. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 11:04 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Enrico Bonadio, Protecting Art in the Street (Dokument Press 2020)Jane Ginsburg, Deep Dive: Burrow-Giles Lithographing v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Turning to functionality, Arnold provides a detailed account of the law from Navitaire v EasyJet, Nova v Mazooma and of course SAS v WPL. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm by Schachtman
Maine 2002); Sullivan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm by admin
Maine 2002); Sullivan v. [read post]