Search for: "Martin v. Challenge Manufacturing Company et al" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
This delay was largely influenced by the interests of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife) and other asbestos mining and product manufacturing companies. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
In 1959, ArmaLite sold the AR-15 patents to Colt's Manufacturing Company. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
The broadcast alleged that a company in South East Asia that manufactured Dyson products abused and mistreated its employees. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
” Kohn and Sanjour battled the EPA for four years, and on May 30, 1995, in a case that impacted every government employee, the United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, in William Sanjour et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Ledesma-Cadhit et al, the plaintiffs invoked the PHACA as a basis for suing a physician and pharmaceutical company in negligence, after their 5 year old daughter died, allegedly as a result of the administration of the H1N1 influenza vaccination during a pandemic health risk in 2009. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
See also Manual at 614 n. 198., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm by Schachtman
Martin, et al., New York Evidence Handbook  318 (2d ed. 2002)). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am by Law Lady
APPALACHIAN TECHNICAL COLLEGE, JASPER GEORGIA, In their individual and official capacities, et al., Defendants, JOAN THOMPSON, Vice President, in their individual and official capacities, DR. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:41 pm by Dennis Crouch
I showed why software product companies can be viewed as high technology manufacturing entities and should be just as eligible for patent protection as computer hardware companies. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
EPA cited the companies for violating the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), which requires companies that manufacture, use or process more than a threshold amount of listed toxic chemicals to file an annual toxic chemical release form with EPA and the state. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
The settlement, filed in federal court today, covers 28 of McWane’s manufacturing facilities in 14 states and also requires the company to perform seven environmental projects valued at $9.1 million. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]