Search for: "Martin v. Franks et al" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Malik Al Nasir claims he has been pressed to remove a reference in his work to Antoinette Sandbach. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
In doing so, Justice Martin emphasized the need for “full and frank disclosure” between parties to support “good faith negotiation” (at para 51), and that the law needs to provide clear presumptions (a clear anchor) so parties can negotiate successfully. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
District Court for the Southern District of New York, defendants have introduced two new ways to rebut Basic Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am by David Greene
”8 These tactics were largely effective: because of the lawsuits, the New York Times pulled its Alabama reporter for several years, sharply limiting its original reporting on events there.9 Both NYT v Sullivan and Abernathy et al. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am by Mark Walsh
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case. [read post]