Search for: "Matter of Brian Z."
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
With a List of Suggested Resources**On June 4, 2020 the Washington Supreme Court issued an open letter to the judiciary and legal community recognizing deep-seated and continuing institutional racial injustice and calling for action to address systemic inequities. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am
Rosensaft (January 27, 2024) Keeping Sight of Our Moral Compass as the Israel-Hamas War Rages By Menachem Z. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
Conversely, it would be improper for a district court to permit a matter to proceed to trial on the basis of vague and unidentified theories. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 7:03 am
[This is a guest post from Mario Zúñiga of EY Law in Lima, Perú. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 9:25 am
However, given the fact that the provision is illegal, this should not matter. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 2:35 pm
According to Myles's complaint, the Office concluded that the evidence appeared to be "fabricated" and observed that "the matter [was] an employment issue and not a criminal one. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:52 am
This title is also available as Open Access.Contributors include Tobias Berger, Kristen Anker, Larry Catá Backer, Tomer Broude, Machiko Kanetake, Francesco Corradini, Lucy Lu Reimers, Grégoire Mallard, Aurel Niederberger, Antoine Duval, Tomáš Morochovič, Caroline Humfress, Keith Culver, Michael Guidice, Julia Eckert, Ralf Michaels, and Brian Tamanaha. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 9:07 am
The Case of Central Asia Brian Blankenship, Promises under Pressure: Statements of Reassurance in US Alliances [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
Research and Resources Combating Internet Trolls: The Right of Publicity and Section 230, 6 Pages Posted: 21 Oct 2020, Brian L. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The SG’s theory would permit any person who claims to suffer a concrete and imminent injury (no matter how trivial) from any one of its myriad provisions or sub-provisions to challenge it as inseverable based on an underlying claim that the mandate or another provision or sub-provision is unconstitutional. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
The Medicaid bill essentially says: residential care provided to patient A on Z date. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm
Mishcon De Reya Data Matters had a post “Data protection: UK Government sets out its position on “essential equivalence” between the UK and EU”. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 10:53 am
Brian Z. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 10:52 am
Brian Z. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:07 pm
Brian H. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 6:37 am
Z. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 6:37 am
Z. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:18 pm
Brian Strom. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
When the Supreme Court of Canada says “X” in 2007, and repeats “X” in 2011 adding explicitly that “X does not mean Y but means Z”, it is reasonable to assume (is it not?) [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:17 am
You are too young to understand this now and it would not matter if you did. [read post]
