Search for: "Matter of City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. Empl. Relations Bd."
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2017, 12:45 pm
Negotiating disciplinary procedures for City of Schenectady police officers held a prohibited subject of collective bargainingCity of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Following administrative review, PERB concluded that it was constrained to follow Matter of City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Following administrative review, PERB concluded that it was constrained to follow Matter of City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
[and] provide for a hearing and an appeal" (See Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
[and] provide for a hearing and an appeal" (See Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
* The decision, City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Appellate Division holds Civil Service Law Article 14 trumps Second Class Cities Law Article 9 with respect to negotiating police disciplinary proceduresCity of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 2:20 pm
[See, also, Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Pub. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
Further, public policy limitations on arbitrability are rare and "almost invariably" involve a nondelegable constitutional or statutory duty (Matter of Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y. v New York State Pub. [read post]