Search for: "Matter of Kagan"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,749
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2024, 7:39 am
We do not know how Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kagan, Gorsuch, and Barrett voted. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 11:23 pm
that it is “better to answer a question that does matter than one that almost certainly does not”.This ruling was accompanied by the observation that the Second Circuit’s view in Sohm v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
As a practical matter, this decision will likely jumpstart long-delayed regulatory and enforcement work at the CFPB, including the vacated payday lending rules that were the subject of this litigation. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:05 pm
But Justice Barrett had limited experience on the bench, wrote little as an academic, and never took any position on controversial matters of concern. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 7:05 pm
And does it matter? [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:11 am
But, no matter the approach taken, we all agree that the names clause does not violate the First Amendment. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm
”But “tradition” is a more complicated matter. [read post]
28 May 2024, 10:03 am
However, the district court found, as a factual matter, that this was not true. [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
Justice Kagan said it must depend on the facts of the case; some notes would be testimonial and some not. [read post]
27 May 2024, 8:58 pm
A related matter: Samuels said that Arizona law is clear in this situation that Rast’s statements are not admissible for the truth of what they assert. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
Concurring opinions by Justices Kagan and Jackson aligned with this result while offering important qualifications on the use of text and history. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:05 pm
I don't have much to say about these doctrinal points in the majority, or Justice Kagan's dissent. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm
In her 34-page dissent, Kagan characterized the majority opinion as “seriously wrong. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
Concurring opinions by Justices Kagan and Jackson aligned with this result while offering important qualifications on the use of text and history. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:45 am
" Did Justice Kagan make such an offer? [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:57 pm
Nealy, ruling that, so long as a claim is timely filed, a copyright plaintiff is “entitled to damages, no matter when the infringement occurred. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
In Blassingame, the conduct forming the basis of liability was public speech on matters of public concern. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:07 pm
Justice Kagan's majority opinion "assume[d] without deciding that a claim is timely under that provision if brought within three years of when the plaintiff discovered an infringement, no matter when the infringement happened. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:55 am
In this case, we assume without deciding that a claim is timely under that provision if brought within three years of when the plaintiff discovered an infringement, no matter when the infringement happened. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:45 am
” Under presidential administration, as Kagan describes it, regulatory activity increasingly becomes “an extension of [the president’s] own policy and political agenda. [read post]
